I feel sad for people who look at Metroid Dread and think it doesn't look good.
Signature goes here!
I feel sad for people who look at Metroid Dread and think it doesn't look good.
Signature goes here!
who is kendra?
"I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007
Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions
Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.
RolStoppable said:
We've had dozens of people on VGC playing and commenting on Metroid Dread in the last couple of weeks and none of them said anything about the graphics being disappointing. You are really the odd one out and you don't live by your own mantra of "play games, not systems." Otherwise you wouldn't keep going on about Metroid Dread needing better hardware to run on. I don't know whether or not time gets reset after a death. But if it does get reset, then the displayed completion time excludes even more than the time spent on the map screen, meaning the game is even longer. What I said is that no other Metroid-like game is receiving the AAA treatment. F.I.S.T. looks like a similar deal as Shin'en games where the graphics make a good impression on a technical level, but are rather sterile as far as the artstyle is concerned, plus the gameplay is standard fare. Nintendo should absolutely get credit for investing in a big variety of genres, including a 2D Metroid, when the AAA industry limits itself to so few types of games. Do you honestly think people here are giving Metroid Dread a pass because it's made by Nintendo? |
I'm really shocked to see you trying to somehow take the mantra of "play games, not systems" and permutate that into a review thread about Metroid Dread lol... I mean, I already explained it, but it's been pretty clear to most people: if a game is good, it's good; if it's bad, it's bad. I don't care what system it's on or who made, I'm here for the games. That DOESN'T read as "love games, not systems" which is how you're interpreting it. Valid criticism is valid criticism (sure, people may not agree, but that doesn't change what it is), and I'll criticize any of the piles of plastic just as equally as any other because, again, "not systems". I have no preferential treatment DESPITE the fact that I grew up on Nintendo and my top two franchises are Zelda and Metroid...
And do I think there is a general sentiment in gaming communities towards games BASED ON the platform? Abso-fucking-lutely, it's the VERY thing I'm working AGAINST. Hence, ironically, the "play games, not systems". The Switch hardware being weak, NSO+ being over-priced, those critcisms of mine have no bearing on whether I WILL or WON'T play a game on the Switch... I almost can't believe I'm explaining this
And look, to everyone else, including mZuzek, I have no intention of making anyone agree with me, but I stand my ground. We'll disagree or agree on things, we'll debate about it, and some dude will make personal attacks on me even though he/she was not attacked by me or my content in any way (lol on so many levels), but what in the hell would I be doing reviews for if I waver and change my opinion just because everyone else says different? I'd have less respect for me, even, if under the pressure of disagreement, I change my mind. *I* wouldn't even watch me if I was that type of person, and the reality is many of you shouldn't expect that from anyone, either. Disagreement, debates, arguments, that's how the world moves forward. But that move forward isn't because a bunch of people had their minds changed, it's because they had their perspectives challenged. This is also why I fight myself so hard to remain neutral, so my perspective remains inclusive of *ahem* all the systems: it offers up a greater overall perspective of how gaming is moving forward (and how some... aren't).
I am loving Dread. I've only ever played, beaten, and enjoyed Metroid Fusion prior to this. Hated Metroid 1, found Super Metroid off-putting, and couldn't stand how much stuff you had to figure out in Prime 1 (which means I never moved on to 2/3). Dread makes sense, is difficult but not impossible, and gives me about as much "scare" as I'd ever want out of a game.
I'm enjoying this thing where Nintendo releasing a more family friendly horror game around Halloween.
Luigi's Mansion 3 - 2019
Metroid Dread - 2021
I assume 2020 not having one was Covid delaying Dread. Curious what their 2022 one will be!
Mnementh said:
Well, I did like RE4, as my first RE. But then I played RE1 - and did like it more. RE4 is the path that brought RE5 and 6. So yes, you can even in that example say changing the formula wasn't the best. Although in a sense, they did it again with 7 and 8, and that went better. |
I think they are somewhat happy with a a game that probably changed third person shooters forever, and is still re-released on every single platform, even though 5 was average and 6 sucked. So changing the formula did work , even if it was for a game and half.
I found it hard to have a strong opinion on Dread, one way or the other. By modern standards, its a good enough Metroidvania, but doesn't merit the 60 bucks price tag. If this is as far as Nintendo could push the genre , then I might be ok with there not being more 2D Metroid games, as other studios are doing more than enough to scratch that itch already without charging a premium for the privilege.
AllfatherStarr said: I found it hard to have a strong opinion on Dread, one way or the other. By modern standards, its a good enough Metroidvania, but doesn't merit the 60 bucks price tag. If this is as far as Nintendo could push the genre , then I might be ok with there not being more 2D Metroid games, as other studios are doing more than enough to scratch that itch already without charging a premium for the privilege. |
I like Metroidvanias and loved Dread, so I will keep buying 2D Metroids, but I'm surprised with the amount of love and overwhelmingly good reception Dread is getting, I wonder if people are playing modern Metroidvanias at all
Damn, this review really reminds me why I un-subbed.
IcaroRibeiro said:
I like Metroidvanias and loved Dread, so I will keep buying 2D Metroids, but I'm surprised with the amount of love and overwhelmingly good reception Dread is getting, I wonder if people are playing modern Metroidvanias at all |
Exactly, it's like rewarding Nintendo for not giving up on the genre, which is bizarre, because the genre itself is thriving more than ever before. As for the Metroid franchise, Prime is a much more novel concept, even now, as there really hasn't been an explosion of exploration based FPS. If I actually sit and think about it, Dread never makes my top 5 Metroidvanias, and maybe not even the top 10.