I'm failing to see at what point Microsoft has ever not had enterprise as its main focus, and when they've ever had a popular consumer product aside from Xbox in the past. Their tablets are also not dead, the division that produces them is making more money than they have before. 

Microsoft Surface FY21 Q2 revenue hits over $2 billion for the first time | Windows Central

"Falling under More Personal Computing is Microsoft's Surface devices, which for the first time broke $2 billion, a modest increase year over year of three percent."

This stuff is easily searchable, to me it just seems you have a preconceived notion about the company and are just trying to use anecdotes to justify it.

Did they ever? Most of their consumer stuff was DOA, even Windows Phone, Microsoft has always been more of a corporate company than a consumer one and they do really well in corporate, leading in OS by a significant margin still, Office is still huge, they're #2 in Cloud, Teams I believe is bigger than Slack, etc. I had a Windows Phone too but it definitely didn't set the world on fire, far from it, Lol, barely anyone had one.

Surface is actually doing well though, it is slowly increasing every year, it became a $2bn business for the first time ever in 2021. Hololens is winning billion dollar contracts cause of the tech. They're very much a leader in many areas still. Investors are loving Satya, Microsoft's financial reports are consistently great.

Not really sure how Google is innovative, Elon Musk while a dick, sure, SpaceX is very innovative, Google though? Chrome has stagnated and is frankly terrible lately, Youtube too, they're a distant 3rd in Cloud, they make most of their revenue from Ads, Android is the same as ever, Stadia is dead, Google is about one of the most boring companies in the industry I would say and far from innovative, they actually play it pretty safe, anything that isn't a instant hit is killed off.

Oh, Edge is gaining market-share too, which I suppose is good, I may switch to Edge because Chrome has lately been awful. Microsoft is pretty boring from a consumer side but at least they have Xbox, I would say they take more risks than Google does as well.

Edge is based on Chrome's source code.  

Which is also open, in which Microsoft now makes plentiful contributions that benefit everyone else using it.

Idk...Bill Gates has his issues too, I wonder if he would have approved of Surface and Xbox was almost killed by him before it even launched simply because it didn't use Windows, I believe he again during the Xbox One era gave his approval for selling off Xbox, which would be essentially killing off Microsoft's only consumer operation, Lol.

Surface started under Ballmer too, supported further under Satya, I would say each CEO has had their own perks, don't know necessarily what one is best but as a consumer, Satya is definitely supporting Xbox more than any other CEO did so that's cool for me.

Yeah, good ol Ballmer said that, an eccentric fella

It is now Satya that is making Microsoft more open though.

Dunno about that... Microsoft is a shadow of what it used to be in the 90s. Windows had 95% market share at one point.

Nowadays, Google and Android are the big guys. Apple is the "designer clothing" one. Valve is the cool one. Linux is the techie one.

Mircrosoft í starting to look a lot like IBM. Big and corporate, and on the way down.

Not really...  Market Cap is just a number (and the first company over both one and two trillion was Apple).  Tobacco companies are worth a chunk of money too, if that's how you value it.

In the old days, Microsoft was like Google but without any competition what-so-ever.  Apple was basically bankrupt (wish you had bought at $10 a share?).  If you bought any computing device to do anything serious it pretty much ran Windows.  Nowadays you actually have a choice to use Microsoft software or not.  That definitely wasn't the case in the past.  

Microsoft lost the technology thought-leadership years ago, basically when Bill Gates left.  Now all the technical stuff starts in Linux, and often it's Google and IBM doing it.  You could even argue that Xbox/Playstation are AMD, and PC gaming is Nvidia.

Market cap is a much better number to go off of when discussing success than market share. Here is why, back in the 80's the percentage of homes that had a computer was 8%. In the 90's this rose to about 35%. Today, in America, almost 80% of households own a computer. Having 95% marketshare of that 35% isn't as lucrative as owning 70% (which is their current marketshare) of that almost 80%.