It was confirmed in the local news where Kirby is from.

Vindication. 

PS5 got that blast processing being one second faster

but seriously it's nice to see it running great on every platform, interesting to see a select few not here.

I am a bit surprised the ps5 is only able to do 1800p with medium shadows as a 2070 can do 4k 60fps at Ultra settings on PC. And for a Raster game, the ps5 should be faster than a 2070.

Yeah I was having the same thought. In terms of rasterization PS5 should really be hitting 4k since its raw FP performance falls between a 2070 and a 2080. I was thinking therefore (given that a Ryzen 3600 sits at 60% usage) it must have had something to do with memory bandwidth, since those Turing cards in that benchmark will have been able to hog the full GDDR6 bandwidth, with separate system memory (probably 32GB @at least 3200Mhz) for the CPU to load all those NPCs. So on that view the PS5 would have been handsomely powerful enough in terms of rendering to do 4k, and in terms of CPU, but comes short on memory bandwidth. It seems to be the only explanatory variable left. 

You gotta keep in mind that those numbers are the average. I bet the RTX 2070 falls below 60fps with a lot more frequency than the PS5.

Did you find it suspicious in the other games where the PS5 outperformed the XSX? Or did you think that it was logical back then?

Look, the PS5 and XSX are vastly different. I think at this point should be very clear that some games will favor one architecture over the other depending on how they were developed. Games that need huge amounts of data to be streamed through the SSD will favor the PS5, while the games that put more strain on the GPU/CPU side of things will favor the XSX.

And why do you think the developers chose those numbers? Lol. 

They are average yea but in order to have an average, the fps also needs to go higher than 60fps and maintain a 60fps or above more often than not for it to be a 60fps average otherwise it will be less. Not to mention the Series X also went below that 60fps as well quite a few times during one of the levels but the devs still kept the resolution throughout the game which I am assuming is because throughout the rest of the game, it was fine.

So for the ps5 to be 1800p and medium shadows, for whatever reason, it needed to be consistently under 60fps at 4k for more than one level if we go by the "Criteria" the devs have for dropping settings/resolution.

What would be suspicious then? They both ran the same settings. So all things the same and one ran better than the other in some games and the other outperformed in other games. And in certain games that had diferent modes one console performed better in a mode and the other outperformed in a diferent mode.

This is the problem. We are no longer seing the same settings to say one is better than the other. But we can see one strugling and one not..so tje strugling one could have had its quality drop a bit and the other one could have its quality increase a bit. How much I don't know. But its ovniious that it's not a 2160 vs 1800 diference.