kirby007 said:
1. Nintendo consoles are the only ones that actually add value aside from just being to play games like you do on PC starting with the wii and ds whether its motioncontrols or touchscreen, they don't feel gimmicky at all. period.
|
Subjective. If you value VR can you get that on a Nintendo platform? And if e throw in controller options, do you have adaptive triggers on any Nintendo platform? Or is this not just relevant and going to gimmicky because its not on a Nintendo platform. Oh, how many games actually used the WiiU screen as a game mechanic, and if it was so great, why did Nintendo drop it? To me, if a feature is not a gimmick, it would at the very least be supported across generations.
kirby007 said:
2. Nintendo doesn't change, you know what you got 30 years ago and you will know what you will get in 30 years from now. quality devices and quality games. hell thas why the offical nintendo seal of quality became the offical nintendo seal, its synonymus for quality!
|
Again, subjective. I think its kinda weird to say or suggest that the only platform that makes quality games and consoles is Nintendo. Probably means I shouldn't take any of this seriously :)
kirby007 said:
3. It has the best diversity in games, where as Xbox only offers multiplayer games and Playstation only offers singleplayer games. Nintendo offers the best of both but in a much more colorful look.
|
Again, subjective. But even if it weren't, you did find that you are very very very wrong. If anything, Nintendo platforms are actually the least diverse of all the platforms. Especially when compared against something like say a PS. There are genres of games that Nintendo doesn't even have a presence in. Right off the top of my head, a sim racer.
kirby007 said:
4. You dont need to be afraid you can play Nintendo games on different platforms, While Nintendo did try their hand on the mobile platform that quickly became irrelevant once they noticed much much better their games were but couldn't sell for their normal full pricing and had to adhere to the GaaS-model. Whereas games for Xbox and Playstation sooner or later will be also available on different platforms due to moneyhatting or creating more profits by expanding the audience and all this over the poor backs of consolewarrior.
|
Why should you be afraid of games you have access to or have already played ending up on another platform?
kirby007 said:
5. No need for an online subscription for games to play online, you play your enemies or friends at home on the same couch ( strictly speaking once Corona blows over or you have infected all your earlier mentioned E/F)
|
Are we talking about paid online multiplayer or local multiplayer here? Because if its the former I am sure Nintendo requires paid online. And if its the latter, I am sure both the PS/Xbox supports local multiplayer. So wrong on both fronts?
kirby007 said:
7. Now i hear you say not every nintendo console is a succes, but you cant help it the unwashed masses are not critical and do not recognise quality. Just blame the damned fanboys and their sunken ideology
|
Them damned pesky console warring fanboys huh?
Technically though, I feel the only gaming platform that is not needed is the Xbox. If you have a decent PC, you literally do not need an Xbox. The same can't be said about Nintendo or Playstation platforms.