It sounds to me that TVs or computer monitors are at 60/120/144 Hz, but I have seen TV 4k at 600 and 1200Hz of fluidity, How is that?
Those are not true refresh rates on the TVs. Can't be done yet.
...to avoid getting banned for inactivity, I may have to resort to comments that are of a lower overall quality and or beneath my moral standards.
Those are interpolated frames. Like inserted frames. Its for smoothing out motion but can add artifacts and can look unnatural (soap opera effect).
Its marketing if anything. Like dynamic contrast that goes into the millions on edge lit LCD TV's/monitors. That takes the highest contrast level to the lowest, its misleading and in no way a replacement for native contrast or frames in this case.
Native refresh rates max out at 120hz on TV's. You want to look out for HDMI 2.1 as a specification as they are capable of doing 4k at 120hz.
| Ryotsu said: It sounds to me that TVs or computer monitors are at 60/120/144 Hz, but I have seen TV 4k at 600 and 1200Hz of fluidity, How is that? |
I am guessing you was looking at a Samsung TV and while it might say HZ on spec sheet, it really being calculated by Samsung CMR formula which uses
Frame Refresh Rate
Image Processor speed
Backlight technology
to come up with the number.
https://www.samsung.com/ca/support/tv-audio-video/what-is-cmr-clear-motion-rate/
So that 1200hz is calculated completely different then the number other tvs are using.
I don't think that means what you think it means.
But regardless do not use frame interpolation on your TV at any setting. It's bad and looks bad and always looks bad.
There's only 2 races: White and 'Political Agenda'
2 Genders: Male and 'Political Agenda'
2 Hairstyles for female characters: Long and 'Political Agenda'
2 Sexualities: Straight and 'Political Agenda'
Stick with 60Hz.for tv and 30fps for gaming.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
| ArchangelMadzz said: I don't think that means what you think it means. But regardless do not use frame interpolation on your TV at any setting. It's bad and looks bad and always looks bad. |
600Hz doesn't look bad on plasma, though the 120Hz/240Hz soap opera effect on LCD/LED does look terrible.
PS1 - ! - We must build a console that can alert our enemies.
PS2 - @- We must build a console that offers online living room gaming.
PS3 - #- We must build a console that’s powerful, social, costs and does everything.
PS4 - $- We must build a console that’s affordable, charges for services, and pumps out exclusives.
PRO -%-We must build a console that's VR ready, checkerboard upscales, and sells but a fraction of the money printer.
PS5 - ^ -We must build a console that’s a generational cross product, with RT lighting, and price hiking.
PRO -&- We must build a console that Super Res upscales and continues the cost increases.
EricHiggin said:
600Hz doesn't look bad on plasma, though the 120Hz/240Hz soap opera effect on LCD/LED does look terrible. |
If something is filmed and made to be played at an extreme refresh rate then sure. But as others have said, 600hz in TV's aren't showing 600 images per second, it's a marketing thing referring to other components.
But regardless of screen, interpolation never looks 'good' it's wonky and almost cartoon like as the media wasn't made for it. If it was filmed for it then sure but if not leave it as intended, is just my opinion on it.
There's only 2 races: White and 'Political Agenda'
2 Genders: Male and 'Political Agenda'
2 Hairstyles for female characters: Long and 'Political Agenda'
2 Sexualities: Straight and 'Political Agenda'
Is 100 hz tv good for gaming 4k, and is there a difference between 200 hz?
ArchangelMadzz said:
If something is filmed and made to be played at an extreme refresh rate then sure. But as others have said, 600hz in TV's aren't showing 600 images per second, it's a marketing thing referring to other components. |
They are correct that it's not true 600Hz, but I've had more than a few friends and acquaintances point out how much smoother my TV is without knowing it's capabilities. I will admit it doesn't work great for films. Not that it's horrible but it certainly doesn't help. Depends on how many screen types and equipment you want to have or can afford for every particular viewing scenario.
PS1 - ! - We must build a console that can alert our enemies.
PS2 - @- We must build a console that offers online living room gaming.
PS3 - #- We must build a console that’s powerful, social, costs and does everything.
PS4 - $- We must build a console that’s affordable, charges for services, and pumps out exclusives.
PRO -%-We must build a console that's VR ready, checkerboard upscales, and sells but a fraction of the money printer.
PS5 - ^ -We must build a console that’s a generational cross product, with RT lighting, and price hiking.
PRO -&- We must build a console that Super Res upscales and continues the cost increases.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
