EricHiggin on 17 March 2020
ironmanDX said:
barneystinson69 said: Super sexy specs.
Also no way this costs less than 600 USD (700-800 CAD). |
Yeah, I'm starting to think that way too.
I have a feeling that such a powerful and expensive console all but confirms the existence of a series S. There is no way that they would leave the majority of console consumers without an option.
|
John mentions something like 'the other next gen console' in the one vid, talking about comparing them, and Rich gives him a bit of a stare. At first I thought John meant PS5 and that Rich was like 'shut up, we're literally at MS now', but later they mention PS, so I can't help but wonder if John actually meant Lockhart.
Rich also slips up, but I think it's in the other video, and says something along the lines of wanting to see something on the Xbox Series S, but then immediately corrects himself and says Series X. His facial expression there also seems telling, as if he's like, 'crap, I might pay for that'.
Why weren't those edited out however? Did MS or DF suggest the 'accidental teasing' of Lockhart Series S, or were they honest mistakes and no big deal?
Last edited by EricHiggin - on 17 March 2020
PS1 - ! - We must build a console that can alert our enemies.
PS2 - @- We must build a console that offers online living room gaming.
PS3 - #- We must build a console that’s powerful, social, costs and does everything.
PS4 - $- We must build a console that’s affordable, charges for services, and pumps out exclusives.
PRO -%-We must build a console that's VR ready, checkerboard upscales, and sells but a fraction of the money printer.
PS5 - ^ -We must build a console that’s a generational cross product, with RT lighting, and price hiking.
PRO -&- We must build a console that Super Res upscales and continues the cost increases.