By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Coronavirus (COVID-19) Discussion Thread

EricHiggin said:
JWeinCom said:

Again, you're avoiding the point by asking a series of abstract questions bearing pretty much no relevance to the actual topic.

The risks inherent in studying the unknown are not comparable with suggesting something that is patently idiotic in light of what we actually do know.  And while there is nothing wrong with asking questions, there is something very wrong when someone who is in a position of authority in the situation hasn't educated himself enough to know what he is suggesting is a terrible idea. 

Who asked the questions that led to nuclear findings? Who made suggestions based on those? What is something immensely destructive we have today that could end the world multiple times over? What started and led to that?

If the scientists knew what nuclear findings would lead to, would they will have asked the questions and made the suggestions? Did they have any authority? Were they not educated enough, even as they learned?

Does anyone know everything and do some hold back what should have been said or asked, which leads to negative consequences for others?

Torillian said:

This isn't about an ideal world where there are always experts around that can give concrete answers to dumb questions. The people that have the concrete answers were there, they just didn't want to annoy the baby-in-chief. And when the dumb question is being broadcast to the entire country that's not good. From what I've read Trump is now saying he was being sarcastic (or at least the administration is) and based on how he ran out before questions during yesterday's press briefing it doesn't seem like he wants to clear up any misunderstandings. So again this all fits with the model I have:

1. Trump is dumb and he gets easily annoyed when told he said something dumb.

2. Trump has been vindictive in the past with his firings so those around him don't want to speak up even when he says something mind numbingly stupid. 

And no administration is ideal either, which is what this is supposed to be about, correct?

Trump has his issues like all leaders have. Trump seems to be vindictive at times, but sometimes people keep quiet to stop themselves from looking worse for their own good. Nobodies perfect.

Your response is a complete non-sequitur.



Around the Network
EricHiggin said:
JWeinCom said:

Again, you're avoiding the point by asking a series of abstract questions bearing pretty much no relevance to the actual topic.

The risks inherent in studying the unknown are not comparable with suggesting something that is patently idiotic in light of what we actually do know.  And while there is nothing wrong with asking questions, there is something very wrong when someone who is in a position of authority in the situation hasn't educated himself enough to know what he is suggesting is a terrible idea. 

Who asked the questions that led to nuclear findings? Who made suggestions based on those? What is something immensely destructive we have today that could end the world multiple times over? What started and led to that?

If the scientists knew what nuclear findings would lead to, would they will have asked the questions and made the suggestions? Did they have any authority? Were they not educated enough, even as they learned?

Does anyone know everything and do some hold back what should have been said or asked, which leads to negative consequences for others?

Torillian said:

This isn't about an ideal world where there are always experts around that can give concrete answers to dumb questions. The people that have the concrete answers were there, they just didn't want to annoy the baby-in-chief. And when the dumb question is being broadcast to the entire country that's not good. From what I've read Trump is now saying he was being sarcastic (or at least the administration is) and based on how he ran out before questions during yesterday's press briefing it doesn't seem like he wants to clear up any misunderstandings. So again this all fits with the model I have:

1. Trump is dumb and he gets easily annoyed when told he said something dumb.

2. Trump has been vindictive in the past with his firings so those around him don't want to speak up even when he says something mind numbingly stupid. 

And no administration is ideal either, which is what this is supposed to be about, correct?

Trump has his issues like all leaders have. Trump seems to be vindictive at times, but sometimes people keep quiet to stop themselves from looking worse for their own good. Nobodies perfect.

You don't seem to have any response other than "But what about [insert falsely equivalized topic]?". People who have had some basis in the fields that they studied in regards to physics, medicine, biology, etc. were the ones asking these questions that you're referring to, NOT a businessman who has no type of professional or even unprofessional experience in any of these fields and therefore has no basis to make these types of suggestions aloud in a press briefing that millions of people across the country are watching. For better or worse, there are people that listen to the President because he is our leader and has a duty to serve the people. The job of a leader should be to provide clear and concise information in time of crisis, correct? I don't care what others may have done or said or not said before him, the point is he is the one in charge now, in a crisis happening now. If he is unable to perform in that regard by not letting the experts in these fields ask the questions instead of him, and stick to providing accurate and vetted information in a way that helps to reassure public confidence, then that is solely on him and no one else.



Enough already with Trump. It was a daily briefing, not a "let the President ramble off silly questions" round. He's there to give answers or say we don't have that information at this time. That's his job. If he has questions he should ask the experts before or after the briefing. If he doesn't know an answer from a journalist he can pass on the question to one of the experts behind him. He's not there to speculate, not his job.


Back on topic, idiots in Canada as well
https://toronto.ctvnews.ca/a-bunch-of-yahoos-ford-says-of-people-protesting-covid-19-emergency-measures-1.4911861

TORONTO -- Ontario Premier Doug Ford says he’s furious at the “bunch of yahoos” who decided to flout physical distancing measures and emergency laws to protest outside Queen’s Park Saturday afternoon, calling them “irresponsible, reckless and selfish.”

About 100 people gathered in front of Queen’s Park, chanting slogans demanding Ford “open up Ontario” and end all emergency measures, with some carrying signs claiming the novel coronavirus is a hoax.

Ford was visibly angry at the gathering, which violates the province’s month-long order banning all gatherings of more than five people.



Meanwhile Canada still has not peaked, the growth did slow again for the weekend but it's wait and see next week whether we've finally peaked or not. And also 8 new cases reported in my local county yesterday.

The USA is still outpacing Europe in reported cases, slowly catching up, 10.3 days behind Europe currently in total cases and set to break the 1 million on Monday, just falling short tomorrow. Europe reached that milestone on April 16th.

In Europe it's a close race between Russia, Spain and the UK for most reported cases (5000 range), while the UK is still on top with distance for most reported deaths (740). Italy, France and Spain are all close together in second (around 400 on average)



Cases went up like crazy the last two days but deaths have stayed constant. Does anyone have hospitalization numbers for each country. Its probably better to look at those for a peak.





China imported 2 billion masks. Chinese regime spreads disinformation, censors media and refuses to disclose data. 

Last edited by Phoenix20 - on 25 April 2020

Around the Network
John2290 said:
sethnintendo said:

This virus is just trying to kill off the real virus on this planet.  Humans

Oh bollachs, the planets surface would be nothing but ever green trees if it weren't for us. Anyway, if we die in billions now or loose technological and inrastructural control of our systems, the planet is in for doomsday, all that will be left are cockroaches and burrowing animals. The planet isn't very smart if this is it's plan. 

The planet isn't a "thing" that has comprehension or plans and thus doesn't "choose" to do anything and thus has no degree of intellectual fortitude, so it's neither "smart" nor "dumb".
It is a rock, floating through space, orbiting a star. - We are just along for the ride. That is all there is to it.

Even when our Star becomes a red giant and evaporates our atmosphere and oceans making all life extinct... The planet will still be here.

EricHiggin said:

I wonder who thought up blasting the human body with radiation? Why would they think that? 'Obviously' that was ridiculous because of the harm it would do. 

Good thing that thought was bashed, rejected, and squashed long ago before they eventually started curing people with that 'idiotic' idea, right?

Are you really supporting the insane idea of injecting disinfectant? I mean really?

Radiation therapy was thoroughly researched and studied and continues even to this day, it is supported by the scientific method. - It is not the same as injecting yourself with disinfectant by some crazy leader who has no clue about science or health.

EricHiggin said:

Pemalite said:

It really hasn't.

"I see that disinfectant knocks it out in a minute, in 1 minute, is there a way we can do something like that, by injection inside or or almost a cleaning, because you see it gets in the lungs and does a number on the lungs".

That is the EXACT god damn quote. It is not taken out of context... It can't be taken out of context.

It really has.

It was implied by others that Trump was saying that people should be injecting themselves with disinfectants. He simply asked if that was possible then suggested the medical doctors may want to take a look at that, and there was no response one way or another from them as far as I could hear.

Everyone with at-least a slight clue on toxicology or basic biology would have known it wasn't possible.

And if Trump had listened to the experts in the medical field and sought actual advice and information he wouldn't have made the stupid suggestion in the first place... And thus not made the USA the laughing stock of the planet.

EricHiggin said:

Not being 100% certain of everything means someone is uneducated?

It's common sense? What about how stupid most people are in general, as you said?

Trump was bragging and praising himself about asking the question? When?

The entire world is laughing at America? The, entire, world? I'd ask how certain you were, but common sense tells me... though my stupidity...

Trump is always praising and self promoting himself at every single possible opportunity, that is what he lives for.

If you don't have a grasp on a particular topic, then you are uneducated when it comes to that particular topic, that is all there is to it... And Trump has proven when it comes to Health, Toxicology and more... He is uneducated.

But instead of improving his education, he rambles off crazy ideas which are not scientifically proven or supported.

Professor Murphy for instance was smiling and giggling at Trumps suggestion... So yeah. The planet is laughing at America, myself included. - Does that bother you? If so, elect a better representative next time!
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-04-24/brendan-murphy-on-donald-trump-coronavirus-inject-disinfectant/12182578

EricHiggin said:

If it was saving lives right now you would presume Trump would've been made aware, so there would be no reason to ask.

Hydroxychloroquine is helping to save some lives as far as I've seen.

Some people do dumb things, yes. I'm not going to point out what the opposition has led some people to do. If people in general are stupid, again as you stated, then surely some are really dumb, and so because a few may make a terrible decision because of that, nobody with any type of widespread reach should say anything at all, considering it could potentially lead to someone hurting themselves?

Since when does someone asking questions make them all knowing? If someone was taught that, it's the teachers fault, not someone else's.

Hydroxychloroquine is an unproven method and isn't saving lives.

There is the saying that "There is no such thing as a stupid question" - Trump has proven that statement to be false.

EricHiggin said:

Trump does act like that at times, so if both can't go together, he should pick one, and so should anyone pointing out what they find negative about him, and it can't be that he's a moron but also a genius. It goes both ways.

People follow him, but he also represents them? The people who are stupid in general? And their leader should be a perfect genius?

There's still many things we don't know. Do we truly know everything there is to know about chemistry and the human body today?

When people are so stupid in general, 'educated' people have to elaborate.

Of course people should point out where he falls short. He is the elected leader of the united states, if he is doing a shit job, he should be ridiculed for it.. Not praised for it.

Trump needs to listen and take note of the experts in the field of science, health and toxicology and more, not ignore them and go off on his own tangent, that is actually ignorance on Trumps behalf... Especially when he can pick up a phone and get the information he needs at the drop of a hat.

EricHiggin said:

Trumps not a scientist and he didn't suggest using it, he asked if it could be. Everything can be dangerous if you look at it that way.

Trump framed the suggestion as a question, don't sugar coat it, don't twist it around to suit the Trump agenda.

He didn't get advice from experts, he is the one at fault, no one else.

EricHiggin said:

Trumps not the most presidential speaker. He also could be more clear at times. Every leader has flaws, and some flaws are much worse than others. Some training probably wouldn't hurt, though it would never be enough anyway, which is probably why he wouldn't bother.

I don't care if he is a presidential speaker or not. If he says something stupid, he says something stupid and he thus deserves criticism for that.

His handling of the Coronavirus has thus far been incorrect, slow and often misinformed.

And now it seems Americans are placing economics above life, which in part is supported by the president.

EricHiggin said:

He asked a question. The only polite suggestion was for the medical doctors to look into it possibly. Leaving it to the professionals.

That seems pretty discriminatory towards someone's religion, so I'm not going to touch this one.

Holding people accountable is necessary, to whatever degree, when they rightfully deserve it.

He should have asked the question in his own time, got educated, that is not the time nor place for that.

Religion? Yeah. Don't care for it, it's not discrimination, their claims just can't hold up to the scientific method or scrutiny, thus... They deserve to be critiqued, not wrapped in bubble wrap so they don't get offended.

And yes, Trump deserves to be held accountable for his blatant failings in dealing with the Coronavirus.

LurkerJ said:
Can we have a "Trump" official thread? because I feel like every off-topic thread turns into a Trump thread. I really didn't expect this one to follow suit and it's getting harder to scroll through Tump's posts just to get COVID19 relevant ones.

I mean, sure. But in this instance it is still on topic.

jason1637 said:
Cases went up like crazy the last two days but deaths have stayed constant. Does anyone have hospitalization numbers for each country. Its probably better to look at those for a peak.

My state had another day of no new cases... So we are on the cusp of having eliminated COVID-19 entirely. Another week to go I guess? And then things will start to open up and economic activity will once again resume with strict border controls.



--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--

https://www.chicagotribune.com/coronavirus/ct-opinion-flashback-1918-flu-pandemic-timeline-htmlstory.html



EricHiggin said:

 

Trump has his issues like all leaders have. Trump seems to be vindictive at times, but sometimes people keep quiet to stop themselves from looking worse for their own good. Nobodies perfect.And no administration is ideal either, which is what this is supposed to be about, correct?

Your acting the apologist for every Trump criticism, using the see through tactic of false equivalency almost every time, it's obvious   

You realize no one is taking you seriously when you defend Trump, you aren't changing anyone's mind, except maybe to harden their view even more 



Just stop Eric. He asked a stupid question. It was so stupid they tried to play it off as being sarcastic. That's when you know you fucked up.



Rab said:
EricHiggin said:

Trump has his issues like all leaders have. Trump seems to be vindictive at times, but sometimes people keep quiet to stop themselves from looking worse for their own good. Nobodies perfect.And no administration is ideal either, which is what this is supposed to be about, correct?

Your acting the apologist for every Trump criticism, using the see through tactic of false equivalency almost every time, it's obvious   

You realize no one is taking you seriously when you defend Trump, you aren't changing anyone's mind, except maybe to harden their view even more 

But what is an apologist?  Shouldn't people apologize more often?  Isn't it good for a person to apologize to another when they have done something wrong?  Do you attack everyone who says they are sorry for something?

What is a tactic?  Is a tactic just a type of strategy?  When a general develops a strategy shouldn't others be able to see it?  

And what is wrong with defending?  Is it wrong for a man to defend his home?  Would you criticize a cornerback when he defends a pass?  Wouldn't the world be a terrible place if nobody defended anything? Doesn't everyone defend something?