Cerebralbore101 said:
I legit didn't know they existed. How long have they been around? I'll be reading them for a while instead of PCG. Also a site called explorminate is pretty damned good if you like 4X games.
Also, I'm so godamned relieved to see you agreeing with me about PCG. I thought I was losing touch, and most people thought PCG was good or decent. But you are one of the biggest PC Gamers (no pun intended) on this site, and you hate it too.
|
Well, DSOG hired one of it's own readers to do some news articles of their own, since they kept on posting news, well ahead of time, before the site itself could cover them. Meanwhile, PCG falls behind on actual news, but instead puts more focus on copy+paste articles like guides we've seen the world over, on games that are months to a year old (it's like they aren't even aware that many YT users make walkthrough's and guides, making reading guides not as in depth or nearly as useful).
Their comments section for the most part is alright, but we made a vote a year and a half ago, which basically makes the comments section to allow free speech, while PCG heavily mods theirs (each article they post with anything related to politics, always ends up with a locked comments section, or heavy bans).
They lost their touch around the start of the mid 10's (we really need a better terminology for our current time frame), when they started taking on new staff and moderators. Since then, they've largely been more in for ads, click bait articles and spamming a Ubisoft style copy+paste approach to gaming news, to pad out their site and make it look like they've got something new going.
These days, you'll see them trying so hard to cover console like news, for a site that is meant to be the forefront of PC gaming news. They recently tried to cover an article on a GTA SA spiderman mod, trying to claim it's close as we're going to get to the PS4 game. Needless to say we all laughed at the editor (even on Twitter), for trying to suggest something so silly, let alone covering it.
I'm all for mod coverage, but for real, I want in depth reviews, benchmarks, settings guides, and talks about the differences between the ports, like DF does and still remains as the one group that do that sort of thing.
I hate them, because they aren't doing anything unique. They aren't wanting to try, and they are more about making click-bait crap and siding with EGS no matter how wrong they are or having their errors pointed out. They'll update their articles if a bit of news comes out, or a slight error, but their critical thought process is inherently flawed, and they refuse to see that, so they keep on going, like a defiant petulant child, who refuses to acknowledge their flawed thought process.
All we want, are PC topics, PC benchmarks, PC modding, talks more of upcoming tech, and old tech that we once used. Instead we're left with recycled garbage and a refusal to change course. That's more or less why I decided to view DSOG more often, because they actually do cover mods, they cover benchmarks and settings, metrics of game performance etc. They actually do care about those things, and I champion them for it.
If PCG is to ever change, they need to let all their editors go, and hire some actual veterans, not wannabe vets that got old and basically lost their initial thought process, on what PC gaming actually is. I know there are plenty out there, who grew old and basically adopted a thought process, that isn't like PC gaming, but more of couch gaming, and a desire to simplify everything, but not every part of PC gaming has to be over simplified and cut back.
Sorry for the long wall, I've just had a hate for PCG for a few years now, and I want them to return to the way they once were.
Lafiel said:
HoloDust said:
DF is only redeeming quality of EG, and honestly, they could probably go on their own if they hired some solid reviewers.
EG occasionally has good deep dive into some interesting topic, but mostly it's just shoddy reviews, SJW agenda, clickbaits and advertorials.
|
I see, so they are actually amazing, but snowflakes can't take opposing opinions and have to flee to their safe space.
|
Reminds me of Resetera. Cannot talk about Cyberpunk, without getting some SJ's into the mix, about not wanting to support CDPR, over two fired employees, and a wish to make a clearly dystopian world, a more pc one, which doesn't make any sense, because Cyberpunk is a Dystopian world, not a Utopian one.
Sadly, the SJ's there have mods on their side, which results in a near completely one sided discussion and a rather large echo chamber of "agree with me or leave my thread" kind of people. Rather sad and twisted.
Last edited by Chazore - on 24 July 2019