Mnementh said:
First of all, the age of exponential increase in power in hardware (Moores law) might be close to end. There are physical barriers we are close to hit. That means in the future new hardware could be not too much better than the one before.
Secondly, if you look into it you learn that also the complexity of hardware is increasing. Blow himself has the example of the thing the later Intel engineer said, that back then they had a phase of knowledge loss. This back then was overcome by new companies, including Intel. But these days the bugs in silicon are increasing rapidly. Operating systems like Linux load a bunch of firmware and fixes to cover for faults in silicon. So hardware has potentially the same problems as software.
|
So ? Even if we are hitting closer to the limit of Moore's Law, we can still make more specialized hardware to increase performance and if there's bug in the silicon then let the hardware guys do a respin of the silicon as well. I don't see the big deal and neither do the rest of the digital industry as well. If nearly everyone are taking for granted superior hardware then let them since thousands of engineers are obviously getting paid to do this ...
If 'maintenance' ever becomes the ultimate problem like Jonathon is implying then just open source both the software and the hardware designs and let the community just take care of it from then on to see if they can do a better job ...
Software is definitely important but I doubt civilization will collapse as we're in the golden age of information where archiving and documentation has more value than ever before so many industries are taking more steps to value data ...