Personally, I like muscles on a WOMAN.  So this particular WOMAN is attractive to me.

Correct. But just because you have a reproductive organ, doesn't mean it falls inline with it being a male or female reproductive organ in terms of classification. Hence the "None of the above".

Pretty sure reproductive organs are mutually exclusive to the biological sex. We're never going to see exclusive males born with ovaries or exclusive females with testicles ... 

I don't think it's possible to have "none of the above" because even if we remove ovaries or testicles, there'll likely still be other associated tissues ... 

You have the opposite sex's "associated tissues" regardless. You should take a look at how the fetus starts out and changes.

And you can have "males" born with ovaries and vice-versa.

because you need to realise that the foundation is the idea that all must be rendered equal

all hierarchical structures must be knocked down

this is the motivating principle of the left and its the driving force behind all of this

that's the line, once you understand that then none of this should surprise you

that's what feminists are talking about when they talk about ending patriarchy, it started obviously with the reigning in of male control but its now evolved into "intersectionality", which has the goal of looking at the differences between people and disregarding them to make everybody equal

in a healthy society a compromise between both the left and the right produces a balance between inclusion and exclusion

but right now things are being tilted all the way over to the left so different aspects of society are becoming inclusive to the point of insanity

people on the left don't seem to be able to comprehend(and many are also simply alarmingly dishonest) that there actually is value in exclusion as there is in inclusion, that hierachies are actually needed and so on and so forth

Why are you so upset by this? The school and parents thought that these books do not teach the right values to their little children so they got rid of the books. Every generation teaches their children differently and if you think this is a new phenomenon than you're wrong, the Grimm brothers, who gathered many of the fairy tales you know today, changed and censored the stories they put into the book because they were too violent for little children, they also refused to put in some fairy tales, like the Puss in Boots, because they were not german enougth for them

I feel like the words gender and sex are getting confused in this conversation.

Which rights and protections that women have and are not based on their biological features do you mean?

All definitions for masculine and feminine traits are arbitrary psychological traits and preferences that can absolutely apply to both biological genders. Take fashion as a simple example. Calling a man feminine because he likes to wear high heals and dresses is just as wrong as calling a woman masculine just because she likes to do body building. They are empty classifications that don't mean anything and are just used to divide and single out people.

Women who lament that just because they are women are simply wrong. Being vulnerable applies to all humans that fall into that category. Anyone can be attacked when alone at night. Calling for special attention to just one biological gender is a slap into the face of everyone else. Everyone deserves protection.

You can't say something that's rooted in fact by scientific and empirical evidence to be a "social construct". It just doesn't work that way, because society doesn't dictate your sex; your DNA/genes do.

Congratulations - you just completed your Gender Studies curriculum and you may collect your bachelors degree at your nearest common sense facility.

"Which rights and protections that women have and are not based on their biological features do you mean?"

since "woman" also includes biological men who identify as women, how would you tell the difference?

"They are empty classifications that don't mean anything and are just used to divide and single out people."

and you don't think there's any utility in classifying people? not to mention that people are going to do it anyway subconsciously outside of its utility

when the group of guys agrees that the woman across the street is hot, that's classification

when the woman and her friends agree that the guys are creepy because they are staring at her that's classification

when the cars pull to the side of the road because they hear sirens, that's classification etc etc etc

yes when taken too far this can cause harm but its kind of an inherent part of reality

"Calling for special attention to just one biological gender is a slap into the face of everyone else."

you have an interesting perspective on this, so things like metoo are just women being hysterical?