On the Social Construction of Sex

[Pemalite]

fatslob-:O said:

Pemalite said:

Correct. But just because you have a reproductive organ, doesn't mean it falls inline with it being a male or female reproductive organ in terms of classification. Hence the "None of the above".

Pretty sure reproductive organs are mutually exclusive to the biological sex. We're never going to see exclusive males born with ovaries or exclusive females with testicles ... 

I don't think it's possible to have "none of the above" because even if we remove ovaries or testicles, there'll likely still be other associated tissues ... 

You have the opposite sex's "associated tissues" regardless. You should take a look at how the fetus starts out and changes.

And you can have "males" born with ovaries and vice-versa.