Cyran said:
Jaicee said:
This may come as a shock to you, but I value eating a lot more than I value Joe Manchin's political career.
|
Maybe you confuse what am debating. I am for raising minimum raise. I am for applying what pressure they can. What am saying is at the end of the day it Joe Manchin decision weather he vote for it or not. No one can make him vote for it. If he says no then they need to pass a bill that he will vote for. Passing nothing not going to help you one bit.
Therefore I not going to blame Joe Biden and the Democratic party if they fail to convince Joe Manchin to vote for it. I also understand why they might prefer to apply the pressure in private rather then public as without Joe Manchin they simply cant pass anything since it unlikely republicans going to help them and public attacking him might make him more resistance as he be afraid it look like he caving to the liberals which would be bad for him in his state.
What I am saying is am assuming Joe Manchin is a selfish person that care more about his political career then you eating and therefore the people in the senate who do care have to work around what they can get him to do otherwise nobody going to get any help at all.
Lyndon Johnson was not successful because he convince those conservative democrats it was the right thing to do. He was successful because he convince them that he would make them pay a heavy price if they did not.
All I was saying is Joe Biden don't have the leverage that Johnson had to make him pay if he don't vote for it.
|
The bolded. Exactly. Johnson's legislative successes and his landslide 61% of the vote in 1964, carrying 44 states, are both feats the Democratic Party hasn't replicated since. That victory was also marked by the sacrifice of five Southern states to his Republican opponent that Democratic candidates had traditionally won. That was the trade-off, and it went to show that Johnson wasn't someone who was dragged around by the more conservative members of his party.
Johnson was a shrewd, cynical, cold-blooded and ruthless politician's politician and that's exactly what made him such an effective president. He didn't have that much of an ideological persuasion per se in reality and much of what he said publicly was bullshit. But he recognized winning issues when he saw that they were now expedient to his political career and wanted to go down in history as an accomplished Commander in Chief who didn't just win elections, but who absolutely crushed his opponents, controlled his party at all times, and set the national agenda at all times. He didn't always succeed, but that was his ambition, and he knew when to bow out.
Much as he's trying to, Joe Biden doesn't convince me that he's that kind of leader. Nancy Pelosi, yes. Joe Biden, no. Give me a soulless, "unlikeable" politician who improves my life any day of the week over a nice guy who doesn't.
Last edited by Jaicee - on 12 February 2021