By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Cyran said:
Rab said:

As for any hold out senator in the Dems not doing the right thing, Bernie had a plan for them, go into their state and send advert after advert about the issue the senator is blocking and see how that works out for them with their constituency, let the people decide what should be done once they know the facts and how there own senator is acting, even put up an alternate Dem candidate when the time is opportune, be very open about what you will do, force the bastards out, or force the bastards to change :/     

Maybe you not familiar with West Virginia but I can Guarantee you if they had successfully primary Joe Manchin out in 2018 that right now the republicans would be in control of the senate 49-51 and that absolutely nothing would be getting done over the next 2 years.

You may be frustrated with Joe Machin but he is the only democrat that can win in west VA so until the Democrats can win in enough areas that they don't need his vote they stuck with negotiating with him because negotiating with Joe Machin is still a million times better then doing it with republicans.

 

Keep playing it safe.. Nothing has been achieved for decades for the working poor under Dems, their lives have been getting worse, the Rich on the other hand have been fairing far better under the Dems (Rep lite), something has to give  

Running scared and not fighting for what is right is the Est. Moderate Dem way and it doesn't get results for those that need it the most, hopefully now that the younger generation of socialists/progressives are coming through the party it will once again be the party for the people not just of the few in power



Around the Network
Rab said:
Machiavellian said:

Same thing for you, let me know how you are going to change votes you need to pass a bill if you do not work with the other side.  You can keep all the high and mighty ideals all day long and do absolutely nothing when it comes to politics because votes matter not ideals.  You can tell the masses that you tried but when nothing happens for some reason you believe just because the majority is on your side it matters.  How many socialistic policy actually has been done, you still need 60 votes for the majority of them and you still need to get pass moderate Dems.  What you are not understanding is that politics will never be a situation you can get everything you want but instead you need to choose things you can successfully achieve first then lobby for others and find ways and deals that move you forward.

You bring up a great point.  Bernie pushed and what exact policy has he accomplished in all his years.  He could not get pass Hillary and he didn't even come close to getting pass Biden.  I am not even sure you were paying attention.  Also even if he was able to be president, exactly how would he actually get anything done when he cannot even get his own party to cooperate let alone the GOP.

As to the last point, if going into a state with adverts was successful, Trump would not be sitting with 74 million votes.  The main reason why a senator will swing one way or the other is because in their state it does not reflect national average.  Man I live on right wing sites and I can tell you one very simple thing, your way of thinking is totally opposite from how they think and that would include the moderate Dem as well.  

It's just the same cop out speak as other moderates have come up with that has got the working poor no where for decades 

Bernie's movement has made progress in getting his ideas into the mainstream despite constant resistance from the "moderates" in the Dems blocking his progressive ideas at every step, but he has persisted and even now some of those moderates are reluctantly moving forward like Biden, without Bernie's dedication God knows what progress would have happened by now, my guess is nothing but the status quo for decades to come 

Your last point about why Trumps ideas even with canvasing didn't do so well so therefore progressive ideas being pushed will also fail is sadly missing the point and is a classic case of moderate thinking 

Good ideas like M4A, Green New Deal, Higher minimum wages, Free college to name a few, are not compatible with ideas like building a wall to keep Mexicans out, dismantling environmental protections for oil and gas giants, tax breaks for the rich to name just a few   

Most progressives have confidence that if people are made aware of the actually polices and how it compares to their local senators voting record they will make the right choice

Making compromises and not actually getting anything done over decades of compromises is the moderate Dem way, the get nothing done for workers Dems

Bernie has a plan to deal with those senators that refuse to budge by involving the people to clearly speak up to their local senator once exposed by huge ad campaigns exposing them, the comprised way of the Rep lites (Est. Dems) have made lives for the working poor worse for decades, for Christ sake try something different    

Let me make this very simple.  How do you get 60 votes to pass filibuster in the Senate.  When you can answer this question you let me know because if you cannot get 60 votes you do not have control in the Senate.  Since the majority of bills must past filibuster to even hit the floor, you tell me how will that be accomplished.  If you do not understand this very important fact about how the Senate operate, why are you even responding.

Bernie plans mean nothing to the GOP, it will do absolutely nothing to move any GOP Senator and if there is a Dem moderate in a predominant state that lean right, it will also do absolutely nothing.  There is some serious pie in the sky type of thinking going on but I believe the reason you believe such measures will work because you really do not understand how the Senate works.

You make compromise because you have to know what you can actually get done and move forward.  The ACA was actually just that, the only reason why it even got pass filibuster was because the Dems had just enough including independents and I believe 3 GOP to get it done.  After that, Obama and the Dems could not get anything moved because they lost seats and then the GOP took control.  This was the start of the do nothing congress.

Anyway, getting back to the very important point so I will reiterate it again, how do you get 60 votes to pass filibuster!!



Machiavellian said:
Rab said:

It's just the same cop out speak as other moderates have come up with that has got the working poor no where for decades 

Bernie's movement has made progress in getting his ideas into the mainstream despite constant resistance from the "moderates" in the Dems blocking his progressive ideas at every step, but he has persisted and even now some of those moderates are reluctantly moving forward like Biden, without Bernie's dedication God knows what progress would have happened by now, my guess is nothing but the status quo for decades to come 

Your last point about why Trumps ideas even with canvasing didn't do so well so therefore progressive ideas being pushed will also fail is sadly missing the point and is a classic case of moderate thinking 

Good ideas like M4A, Green New Deal, Higher minimum wages, Free college to name a few, are not compatible with ideas like building a wall to keep Mexicans out, dismantling environmental protections for oil and gas giants, tax breaks for the rich to name just a few   

Most progressives have confidence that if people are made aware of the actually polices and how it compares to their local senators voting record they will make the right choice

Making compromises and not actually getting anything done over decades of compromises is the moderate Dem way, the get nothing done for workers Dems

Bernie has a plan to deal with those senators that refuse to budge by involving the people to clearly speak up to their local senator once exposed by huge ad campaigns exposing them, the comprised way of the Rep lites (Est. Dems) have made lives for the working poor worse for decades, for Christ sake try something different    

Let me make this very simple.  How do you get 60 votes to pass filibuster in the Senate.  When you can answer this question you let me know because if you cannot get 60 votes you do not have control in the Senate.  Since the majority of bills must past filibuster to even hit the floor, you tell me how will that be accomplished.  If you do not understand this very important fact about how the Senate operate, why are you even responding.

Bernie plans mean nothing to the GOP, it will do absolutely nothing to move any GOP Senator and if there is a Dem moderate in a predominant state that lean right, it will also do absolutely nothing.  There is some serious pie in the sky type of thinking going on but I believe the reason you believe such measures will work because you really do not understand how the Senate works.

You make compromise because you have to know what you can actually get done and move forward.  The ACA was actually just that, the only reason why it even got pass filibuster was because the Dems had just enough including independents and I believe 3 GOP to get it done.  After that, Obama and the Dems could not get anything moved because they lost seats and then the GOP took control.  This was the start of the do nothing congress.

Anyway, getting back to the very important point so I will reiterate it again, how do you get 60 votes to pass filibuster!!

I'll make it real simple for you

The compromise option the Dems have taken for decades has led to what we have today, the working poor have been going backwards, the middle class have been going backwards, they haven't even got gun control to work, and with the Dems compromises the Rich have done amazingly, they are rolling in it (and not just BS)  

So excuse me if I'm not convinced  

Last edited by Rab - on 11 February 2021

Bernie Sanders takes to task a "Moderate" Dem 'Neera Tanden' in a budget committee to confirm her position as the lead of Office of Management and Budget (Biden's pick), he doesn't hold back on her past rolls and actions, making it public for all to see and witness so the public can see who they really have in that office 

 

Last edited by Rab - on 10 February 2021

Rab said:
Machiavellian said:

Let me make this very simple.  How do you get 60 votes to pass filibuster in the Senate.  When you can answer this question you let me know because if you cannot get 60 votes you do not have control in the Senate.  Since the majority of bills must past filibuster to even hit the floor, you tell me how will that be accomplished.  If you do not understand this very important fact about how the Senate operate, why are you even responding.

Bernie plans mean nothing to the GOP, it will do absolutely nothing to move any GOP Senator and if there is a Dem moderate in a predominant state that lean right, it will also do absolutely nothing.  There is some serious pie in the sky type of thinking going on but I believe the reason you believe such measures will work because you really do not understand how the Senate works.

You make compromise because you have to know what you can actually get done and move forward.  The ACA was actually just that, the only reason why it even got pass filibuster was because the Dems had just enough including independents and I believe 3 GOP to get it done.  After that, Obama and the Dems could not get anything moved because they lost seats and then the GOP took control.  This was the start of the do nothing congress.

Anyway, getting back to the very important point so I will reiterate it again, how do you get 60 votes to pass filibuster!!

I'll make it real simple for you

The compromise option the Dems have taken for decades has led to what we have today, the working poor have been going backwards, the middle class have been going backwards, they haven't even got gun control to work, and with the Dems compromises the Rich have done amazingly, they are rolling in it (and not just BS)  

So excuse me if I'm not convinced  

Still have not answered my question.  How do you get 60 votes.  You are wasting time with everything else because none of that means anything unless you can get to 60 votes in the Senate.  I am not trying to convince you of anything, I am trying to understand where you believe the Dems will get 60 votes to accomplish everything you think they should be doing.  Once you can solve that problem then everything else changes but until then, compromise is where its at because no matter how you believe the Dems can just think it and it will be done, 60 votes is still required. 



Around the Network
Machiavellian said:
Rab said:

I'll make it real simple for you

The compromise option the Dems have taken for decades has led to what we have today, the working poor have been going backwards, the middle class have been going backwards, they haven't even got gun control to work, and with the Dems compromises the Rich have done amazingly, they are rolling in it (and not just BS)  

So excuse me if I'm not convinced  

Still have not answered my question.  How do you get 60 votes.  You are wasting time with everything else because none of that means anything unless you can get to 60 votes in the Senate.  I am not trying to convince you of anything, I am trying to understand where you believe the Dems will get 60 votes to accomplish everything you think they should be doing.  Once you can solve that problem then everything else changes but until then, compromise is where its at because no matter how you believe the Dems can just think it and it will be done, 60 votes is still required. 

Well that's disingenuous pretending I gave no answer, gaslighting is your usual fall back, you ignore my answer which is actually Bernie's answer on how he sees it to get the votes changed of Dem and/or Rep senators, by using the people who are informed in each constituency to the point that each senator cant ignore the existential threat to their re-election

Bernie believes his progressive ideas hold water with the people who need them, not the rich senators, so he goes straight to the people and around the senators, not going to constantly repeat it as all you need to do is look at previous posts of mine

Anyway answer my question.. How have the Dems done with their compromise model for the working poor in the US over the decades? Explain to me how much the standard of living of the working poor has raised to heights never seen before? How has that worked out? :/ 

Last edited by Rab - on 11 February 2021

Rab said:
Machiavellian said:

Still have not answered my question.  How do you get 60 votes.  You are wasting time with everything else because none of that means anything unless you can get to 60 votes in the Senate.  I am not trying to convince you of anything, I am trying to understand where you believe the Dems will get 60 votes to accomplish everything you think they should be doing.  Once you can solve that problem then everything else changes but until then, compromise is where its at because no matter how you believe the Dems can just think it and it will be done, 60 votes is still required. 

Well that's disingenuous pretending I gave no answer, gaslighting is your usual fall back, you ignore my answer which is actually Bernie's answer on how he sees it to get the votes changed of Dem and/or Rep senators, by using the people who are informed in each constituency to the point that each senator cant ignore the existential threat to their re-election

Bernie believes his progressive ideas hold water with the people who need them, not the rich senators, so he goes straight to the people and around the senators, not going to constantly repeat it as all you need to do is look at previous posts of mine

Anyway answer my question.. How have the Dems done with their compromise model for the working poor in the US over the decades? Explain to me how much the standard of living of the working poor has raised to heights never seen before? How has that worked out? :/ 

Again, we've already seen how Bernie's candidate fared in West Virginia. First they got stomped by Joe Manchin, then they got stomped by a republican. Unfortunately we just don't exist in a fantasy land where progressive candidates are viable in deep red states. In fact, it is quite possible that Joe Manchin is the only Democrat who could win a Senate seat in WV short term.

We simply wouldn't be sitting here discussing $1400 checks and minimum wage increases if it weren't for the moderate/conservative Democrats holding seats in Red states, even if those checks and minimum wage increases aren't as high as you'd like. I've said it before and I'll say it again, the only way to fulfill a progressive agenda is by following the votes of the people. In 2020 we elected a Moderate Democrat as president, lost seats in the House and earned a split senate. It isn't the government who has failed to bring a full and complete progressive agenda to the table, it is the people who have failed to vote for one.

Nobody wants to compromise their positions, but until the people put us in a position where compromise isn't necessary, it is the only tool we have available.



Rab said:
Machiavellian said:

Still have not answered my question.  How do you get 60 votes.  You are wasting time with everything else because none of that means anything unless you can get to 60 votes in the Senate.  I am not trying to convince you of anything, I am trying to understand where you believe the Dems will get 60 votes to accomplish everything you think they should be doing.  Once you can solve that problem then everything else changes but until then, compromise is where its at because no matter how you believe the Dems can just think it and it will be done, 60 votes is still required. 

Well that's disingenuous pretending I gave no answer, gaslighting is your usual fall back, you ignore my answer which is actually Bernie's answer on how he sees it to get the votes changed of Dem and/or Rep senators, by using the people who are informed in each constituency to the point that each senator cant ignore the existential threat to their re-election

Bernie believes his progressive ideas hold water with the people who need them, not the rich senators, so he goes straight to the people and around the senators, not going to constantly repeat it as all you need to do is look at previous posts of mine

Anyway answer my question.. How have the Dems done with their compromise model for the working poor in the US over the decades? Explain to me how much the standard of living of the working poor has raised to heights never seen before? How has that worked out? :/ 

Oh, I am sorry, I did not know you actually believed Bernie answer was an actual answer to getting 60 votes or more in the Senate by just advertising in a GOP right leaning state.  Ok, if that is your answer, I would love to know why it would be successful. How long do you believe this advertising effort will take and how much cash will it involve.  I am not knocking the ideal, I just believe that is more pie in the sky type of thinking if you have no experience interacting with people who think totally different then you.  Lets think this through for a sec, if Bernie progressive views hold so much water, why did he not even come close to winning the Dem primary.  

The fact is as Sundin pretty much stated is that the people on the right and on the left do not believe in a total progressive strategy.  Its not like people do not know what Bernie stands for and his policies, especially Dems.  The issues is that people do not believe in them and thinking that some advertising effort will suddenly make them see the light appears as if you have not paid attention to the elections for the last decade or better.

As to what compromise will do, well it get actual issues on the Senate floor for a vote.  When that happens, it actually gets certain bills an actual chance of success like the ACA which would not have happen without compromise.  There was no way it would have passed the Senate if Dems and Obama did not get those 3 GOP members to vote on it and they had to compromise in order to get the deal done.  If the Dems actually kept control longer you probably would have seen a lot more stuff done but then McConnell took over and we know what happen from there on.

Hell, you got your 600 bucks stimulus which definitely would not have happen since every other bill did not even make it to the floor.  Now that the Dems have the deciding vote on issues that does not go to filibuster they can pass some stuff but even so the majority of issues will still require 60 votes.  

The thing is you seem to have a lot of faith in Bernie, the problem is that not enough people who vote even within the Dem party do.



Machiavellian said:
Rab said:

Well that's disingenuous pretending I gave no answer, gaslighting is your usual fall back, you ignore my answer which is actually Bernie's answer on how he sees it to get the votes changed of Dem and/or Rep senators, by using the people who are informed in each constituency to the point that each senator cant ignore the existential threat to their re-election

Bernie believes his progressive ideas hold water with the people who need them, not the rich senators, so he goes straight to the people and around the senators, not going to constantly repeat it as all you need to do is look at previous posts of mine

Anyway answer my question.. How have the Dems done with their compromise model for the working poor in the US over the decades? Explain to me how much the standard of living of the working poor has raised to heights never seen before? How has that worked out? :/ 

Oh, I am sorry, I did not know you actually believed Bernie answer was an actual answer to getting 60 votes or more in the Senate by just advertising in a GOP right leaning state.  Ok, if that is your answer, I would love to know why it would be successful. How long do you believe this advertising effort will take and how much cash will it involve.  I am not knocking the ideal, I just believe that is more pie in the sky type of thinking if you have no experience interacting with people who think totally different then you.  Lets think this through for a sec, if Bernie progressive views hold so much water, why did he not even come close to winning the Dem primary.  

The fact is as Sundin pretty much stated is that the people on the right and on the left do not believe in a total progressive strategy.  Its not like people do not know what Bernie stands for and his policies, especially Dems.  The issues is that people do not believe in them and thinking that some advertising effort will suddenly make them see the light appears as if you have not paid attention to the elections for the last decade or better.

As to what compromise will do, well it get actual issues on the Senate floor for a vote.  When that happens, it actually gets certain bills an actual chance of success like the ACA which would not have happen without compromise.  There was no way it would have passed the Senate if Dems and Obama did not get those 3 GOP members to vote on it and they had to compromise in order to get the deal done.  If the Dems actually kept control longer you probably would have seen a lot more stuff done but then McConnell took over and we know what happen from there on.

Hell, you got your 600 bucks stimulus which definitely would not have happen since every other bill did not even make it to the floor.  Now that the Dems have the deciding vote on issues that does not go to filibuster they can pass some stuff but even so the majority of issues will still require 60 votes.  

The thing is you seem to have a lot of faith in Bernie, the problem is that not enough people who vote even within the Dem party do.

Funny thing is, that progressive policy of M4A is hugely popular with both Dems and Rep voters, but the "Moderates" have been against it from the beginning

Your example of what compromise can do is very weak, the fact is the working poor have nothing to show for all those years of compromise, but you know that because you avoided having a better example of it's "success",  it's sad all that compromise has done is so little, when will people learn, maybe never in your case :p

The Dems strategy has produced the worst out comes for the working poor in decades, and you still think it works lol

  



sundin13 said:
Rab said:

Well that's disingenuous pretending I gave no answer, gaslighting is your usual fall back, you ignore my answer which is actually Bernie's answer on how he sees it to get the votes changed of Dem and/or Rep senators, by using the people who are informed in each constituency to the point that each senator cant ignore the existential threat to their re-election

Bernie believes his progressive ideas hold water with the people who need them, not the rich senators, so he goes straight to the people and around the senators, not going to constantly repeat it as all you need to do is look at previous posts of mine

Anyway answer my question.. How have the Dems done with their compromise model for the working poor in the US over the decades? Explain to me how much the standard of living of the working poor has raised to heights never seen before? How has that worked out? :/ 

Again, we've already seen how Bernie's candidate fared in West Virginia. First they got stomped by Joe Manchin, then they got stomped by a republican. Unfortunately we just don't exist in a fantasy land where progressive candidates are viable in deep red states. In fact, it is quite possible that Joe Manchin is the only Democrat who could win a Senate seat in WV short term.

We simply wouldn't be sitting here discussing $1400 checks and minimum wage increases if it weren't for the moderate/conservative Democrats holding seats in Red states, even if those checks and minimum wage increases aren't as high as you'd like. I've said it before and I'll say it again, the only way to fulfill a progressive agenda is by following the votes of the people. In 2020 we elected a Moderate Democrat as president, lost seats in the House and earned a split senate. It isn't the government who has failed to bring a full and complete progressive agenda to the table, it is the people who have failed to vote for one.

Nobody wants to compromise their positions, but until the people put us in a position where compromise isn't necessary, it is the only tool we have available.

Your in a fantasy world if you think doing the same will change anything for the working poor, it hasn't in decades

It's only now with Bernie's movement that some light is showing through the cracks

As the old saying goes doing the same thing expecting different results is madness