coolbeans said:
Hilarious to bring up the 'wrong side of history' after such dishonest framing here. It doesn't matter what justified responses a person makes (duty to retreat, etc.) to some of you people; if he's not in the club no excuse will satisfy. Kyle Rittenhouse was absolutely defending himself and the ire ought to be on the now-maimed & killed dips who escalated this situation. Period. |
So just to be clear, you are saying that Kyle is totally clear in what he was doing. Meaning that he armed himself with a Assault Rifle traveled to an area he did not live, went to a location where people were protesting. Are you saying that none of his actions had anything to do with the conflict that happen and he was this innocent 17 year old boy looking for peace and love.