If you're just being uber specific now all of the sudden, meaning you didn't say exactly that, but said the same thing in meaning using different words, that I didn't bother quoting this time since it hasn't help prior, then you're just being difficult for the sake of it and I'm not dealing with that.

If you truly don't think you meant that, then there's no point in continuing. If you don't know what you said or meant, or meant something totally opposite based on what you said, then there's no point in conversing with you any further, because it's like we're speaking different languages.

Considering you've gone ahead and pointed out already, that you know better as to what I meant by what I've said than I do, well... you know best.

I am not being specific. I did not say those things in meaning, or in different words. You seem to have a brain which must reduce things down when you are met with something even the slightest bit complicated, and in doing so, you lose the ability to understand the things that you are attempting to engage with.

I'll repeat my summary one more time, for posterity:

Trump can't simultaneously say "We need to get these conflicts of interest out of politics", fill his administration with conflicts of interest and then sit back and say "I did it! Aren't I the best?"

Stop being like this. 

If the homeless person has an income then yes, it's taxed.  If they purchase anything, then yes, they pay taxes. 

Ar you seriously trying to find a demographic that you can point to that never pays any taxes just so you can point your finger and go, "See....they don't pay taxes.  I win."  Because that's what this discussion looks like to everyone else.

Highlighted: Find the error in reasoning.

Yeeeeah, I noticed he was doing this and have decided to not respond to him. He has nothing of value to say, just like Eric Higgin. I'm noticing a pattern of people who have a tenuous grip on reality and a complete lack of relevance when it comes to their arguments to what they're discussing. IT's kinda sad. 

"THEY LOCKED ME UP IN A CAGE!" 

"Well just leave, they can't hurt you if you leave." 

Perfect, flawless logic from KLAMarine! 

Sure, at an airport that I live several hours away from.

This is a conversation that just happened.

CaptainExplosion: "GOP blocking coronavirus bill — because it limits how much drugmakers can charge for a vaccine."

KLAMarine: [irrelevant] CE should donate to fund virus research.

Runa216: He donated with his taxes.

KLA: [tangent] Not everybody pays taxes.

CE: No way to know if my donation would go towards the goal.

KLA: [completely ignoring that CE already pays taxes] CE should hand out supplies at the airport.

CE: I live hours away from an airport.

KLA [Still ignoring that CE pays taxes] Suggesting CE is putting his own profit over people by not going several hours to an airport to hand out supplies.

CE: I don't have a car and am financially limited.

KLA: [Still ignoring that CE pays taxes and is financially limited] CE should buy a car.

Everybody: Are you F-ing serious?

KLA: [Still ignoring that CE pays taxes and is financially limited] CE should ride a bike several hours away [by car] to an airport to hand out supplies so that he don't look like he's putting his own profit over people that might die.

Everybody: Are you F-ing serious?

KLA: [Still ignoring that CE pays taxes and is financially limited] CE should hand out supplies at a bus stop to not look like he's putting his own profit over people that might die.

You could make an inverse comic wherein the life raft itself is not good enough at all and the guy does offer a "more inspiring raft" that benefits all of them but they all choose the original ineffective life raft anyway because its what they've always chosen.