I guess you didn't get the Joke. I agreed with your first few sentences and made a sarcastic post. Oh well, I guess some Democrats are unable to understand jokes.

I will tell you what to share, because Tucker Carlson is a shitty, disingenuous, wrong person flaunting his ignorance as wisdom and it's actively making the world a worse place. He's disgusting, he's wrong about virtually everything he says, and people believe him because he says it with consistency and self-assuredness. Almost everything he says is either hilariously wrong, morally abhorrent, or completely disingenuous. 

People like him and Tomi Lahren and Ben Shapiro and yes even dear president trump need a team of fact-checkers on everything they say becuase they're so consistently wrong about so many things so quickly that the wave of stupidity crashes over their viewers before they have time to think about what he said. If people did a sentence-by-sentence breakdown on the things he said, correcting or checking validity, the fact-checker's essay would be 4x as long as Tucker Carlson's nonsense. 

His rapid-fire-ignorance is exactly how stupid people come to follow this horribly wrong rhetoric. He says a thing that's wrong but kinda sounds right if you don't think too hard on it, then he moves onto the next wrong thing that the mindset of 'that seems right' plants itself in your head and just keeps going until he's done his rant of stupidity. 

So many republican representatives are like that, and it's gross that it works. 

https://youtu.be/2vMK-p6-M5E

https://youtu.be/aDMjgOYOcDw

I know you won't watch them (between the two videos it's nearly two hours of a dude just breaking down a bunch of the stupid shit Ben Shapiro and tucker Carlson have said and why their argument style is dangerous and how they managed to get such a following despite being easily provably wrong on pretty much everything)

Dude, you need to stop with these analogies. They are painfully bad.

Again, you do not have a third option of simply not having a President. That isn't how voting works. Why do you continue to imply that, if you don't like the two options, not voting will produce a superior outcome to voting for the lesser of two evils? It won't. You are going to get one of the available options, so either you can make the decision about who the lesser of two evils is, or you can let some idiots make that decision for you.

Every single time I've seen you make an analogy, it has been painfully broken. Why do you keep trying? Nobody is struggling with the idea of voting for a president and thinks "You know, this would be so much easier to understand if it was compared to Chernobyl". It is just unnecessary.

You'll have to follow the conversation. 

If there wasn't nuclear fusion happening at the core of the sun, would there still be solar flares?

Well you won't know if you just keep voting. How do you think the free market works? Are you forced to buy a certain product you want, even if both companies make a lousy version of it? Can you refuse to purchase it, complain in some manner, and eventually get a better version from either of those companies or a new start up? That's not possible in politics?

It was based off of a general point of not doing something because it could end up bad, which could be anything. It's not directly related to Chernobyl, and if that's what you're trying to link it to, then no wonder why you're lost.

-Not relevant to the main point. Are we really going to try and cherry pick things that were said and pretend that's what the focus was? That goes both ways.

-What? LOL.

-Something similar to solar flares would be impossible to mimic on Earth? Not possible in anyway? What about something similar to the way the sun works at it's core? Is that possible?

-I realize you think that.

-Quoting and misunderstanding/misrepresenting what was meant are not the same thing.

-It was nuclear fusion, which can lead to solar flares, as well as other explosion type events.

-Yes I do. Do you? Without nuclear fusion at the core of the sun, solar flares would still be possible?

-Was a nuclear meltdown planned or anticipated at Chernobyl? If so, why did they build it or why didn't they stop/avoid it? Did something unanticipated go wrong?

-Proof? LOL.

-You said I was wrong because I clearly didn't know anything, yet you kept asking for an explanation. I asked for you to explain to me then, based on your knowledge. You refused. Then you offered to help explain. I asked why you haven't explained yet then. You replied again above, without proving what little you tried to justify.

You already answered that question and said it's not possible, so why are you saying I should ask if it's possible so we can address it?

Didn't realize America relied so heavily on Chinese medical products. Free health care? Hmm.

*Chinese medical products are far superior. China would never manipulate. China is the best.

And will continue to do so, since the american pharma giants asking prices are way above what most people can afford even with a healthcare plan while the chinese drugs are mostly generics. But that's only true in the US because nobody's there to reign in anybody in that domain - as opposed to virtually every other country in the world.

a certain someone needs to understand that correlation is not causation. (Not you, you're fine)

You: *Compares voting to buying a product*

Me: Your analogy of "buying" a product doesn't work for voting because you end up having to purchase a product even if you don't vote (ie, a President gets elected).

You: Yeah, but what if we compare voting....to buying a product

Dude...

Its time to stop.