SpokenTruth said:
So you're going to totally forget we already had this conversation several times on this forum, huh? Ok, you brought it up. All these are quotes from me. "And who do you think was supposed to investigate the missing IMF money? Prosecutor Viktor Shokin. And he did not do the investigation. In fact, he did not do a lot of investigations. 1 of the investigations he was supposed to do but didn't was the investigation into Burisma. This is why the US, Canada, UK, EU, World Bank and IMF all wanted Shokin fired. It wasn't just Biden." "You seem to think Prosecutor Shokin was fired because he was investigating Burisma (which Hunter Biden happen to be a board member of). BUT, that's not why he was fired. It's the opposite. Shokin stalled the investigation into Burisma that his predecessor started. He also stalled dozens of other investigations. One of those investigations what about what happened to billions of dollars the IMF and World Bank loaned Ukraine...hence why the global community supported the firing of Shokin and why Joe Biden was tasked with working with Ukraine to remove him. Shokin was protecting his corrupt friends from prosecution. This is all well documented and has been known for years." I even recall directly replying to you about it but those threads are closed now. And by the way.....what happened after Vicktor Shokin was fired? A new prosecutor as brought in and completed the investigation into Burisma. Also, didn't you know the investigation into Burisma began BEFORE Hunter joined the board? So how could Shokin have been investigating Hunter Biden if he wasn't even there yet? Also...did you know that Hunter stepped down from the board of Burisma in April 2019 once his father Joe Biden announced his presidential candidacy so as not to create conflict of interest? Finally, Shokin's replacement (Lutsenko) and his replacement (Riaboshapka) have both stated that they have not seen any evidence of wrong doing by Hunter or Joe Biden. All of this is easily accessible public record. But you and the Republicans want an investigation for answers that have already been answered for years. |
So we spoke about some of it before, and? What were the arguments from the other side, or was it just you? How did the conversation end?
Completed the investigation. How do we know he didn't just fill the hole back in? So you're saying that Burisma was already corrupt, which is why Hunter ended up there, making corrupt deals, and could have ended up getting tangled up in it legally as well?
Well if Hunter was still working there when all this came to light, it would look even worse, wouldn't it? Thinking ahead to potential negative media coverage possibly? I've been told that doesn't happen by others, so not sure what or who to believe.
Does that mean there was no wrong doing? Do those individuals know all? What about the Russia investigation? Seems like after Mueller, the one and only person who could get to the bottom of the Trump Russia connection, wasn't able to. It's seems fairly clear though that even after Muellers lack of findings, that the evidence is apparently still out there and that Trump has been a 'pawn of Putin', so...