They said, "So then why does his administration have revolving door employment when other administrations did not?" Are you saying the threshold for too much turnover is literally tied to Trump? Show me where I said anything close to previous Presidents didn't fire anybody. My point with the links was to specifically show that previous Presidents did in fact do their fair share of firing. Trump firing more in a shorter amount of time doesn't mean other administrations didn't have what you would consider rotating doors at that point in time. That's like asking why does the majority of the population think the world is round when previous generations knew it was flat? I dunno, maybe because things changed between then and now and have to be taken into account.

Nobody seems to be care about that though. Saying Jeff has fired a tonne from his many giant warehouses but grandpa fired way less from the small original back in the day, doesn't make any sense if the amount of employees isn't equal and society has changed. More complexity leads to more problems. Just like all of Jeff's msm and social media problems that his grandpa didn't have. When he grew up he was just another small business and those things didn't even exist.

They said, "So then why does his administration have revolving door employment when other administrations did not?" Are you saying the threshold for too much turnover is literally tied to Trump? Show me where I said anything close to previous Presidents didn't fire anybody. My point with the links was to specifically show that previous Presidents did in fact do their fair share of firing. Trump firing more in a shorter amount of time doesn't mean other administrations didn't have what you would consider rotating doors at that point in time. That's like asking why does the majority of the population think the world is round when previous generations knew it was flat? I dunno, maybe because things changed between then and now and have to be taken into account.

Nobody seems to be care about that though. Saying Jeff has fired a tonne from his many giant warehouses but grandpa fired way less from the small original back in the day, doesn't make any sense if the amount of employees isn't equal and society has changed. More complexity leads to more problems. Just like all of Jeff's msm and social media problems that his grandpa didn't have. When he grew up he was just another small business and those things didn't even exist.

I think the obvious way to interpret Trump having 'revolving door employment' is that the turnover is high relative to the norm of previous Presidents - it's really not that difficult...

Seriously, you're missing all context here.

Again, nobody is saying that other presidents didn't have sometimes high turnovers. But as far as I know, none of them even came close to Trump's turnover rates. That's the context you seem to miss all the time, that Trumps turnover is very high when compared to other presidents in the past.

Your entire last segment just highlights that you missed the entire context. You compare to corporations and say that there haven't been many firings in the white house compared to that. We compare apples to apples, meaning US presidents from the past to Trump, not some random bad corporation boss to Trump in office as US president.

Who said its not truthful.  Basically you have about 3 books out there from different people.  When all is said and done, its their word over Trumps even though some of the books has quotes from other people within the administration.  Most reasonable people who has followed this administration would have a hard time believing anything coming from Trump since he has a hard time with the truth.  There is no reason to not believe these people because multiple people inside the administration have said the same thing.  If you only believe what Trump says then I would have to believe you have a Messiah complex.

As to your second paragraph, you still throwing out words that has nothing to do with what I stated.  I said top positions. You know, the ones that need the President approval so you can stop with the every single hire nonsense. Lets just limit the scope to the Cabinet positions which is the ones he personally put his signature on.  As always you totally ignore Trump personal statement that he only hires the best people.  I know, its just another thing you can ignore from Trump since it doesn't fit with your defense.

Who said it is? What portion of those books are direct quotes? What portion of the book needs to be truthful to make the entire thing completely factual? There's only room for one Messiah and it's not Trump.

Just because Trump hires the best people, doesn't mean they meet his standards. Good enough for now until I can find someone better is sometimes necessary when you have as much to do and as much responsibility as he has, not to mention the constant negative media coverage, warranted and not. You can't just leave positions open for extended periods and expect to make worthy progress, even if that progress you make is less than you would like it to be.

Neither is pissing into the wind, but simply taking a few evident things into account would quickly reveal, aimlessly doing just that would be quite foolish.

If I'm missing something it's not the expressed context. Some are. 

Apples to apples? You missed the point. How large was the Gov when it started compared to now? Much bigger Gov, in a time of promoted victimhood and (legal) retaliation, more problems? How much of an issue was the media for the Gov when it started compared to now? Much more (opinionated) media, instantly broadcasting worldwide, more problems? 

The climate is much worse today then it's ever been, did you know that? - Sure, everyone knows that, but what's your point? - Don't you want to know why it's changing and what's causing it? - Why would you ask that? That wouldn't be an apples to apples comparison anymore now then would it?

Who said it is? What portion of those books are direct quotes? What portion of the book needs to be truthful to make the entire thing completely factual? There's only room for one Messiah and it's not Trump.

Just because Trump hires the best people, doesn't mean they meet his standards. Good enough for now until I can find someone better is sometimes necessary when you have as much to do and as much responsibility as he has, not to mention the constant negative media coverage, warranted and not. You can't just leave positions open for extended periods and expect to make worthy progress, even if that progress you make is less than you would like it to be.