The problem is not the firing people or the resignations in itself, as every President has this to some degree. The problem is the rate at which it happens. Trump has already more of them than many presidents who served 2 terms while he's just halfway through one term.

Key word is here "entertaining" and not truthful. So Trump is tough in business and politics and so it's hard for him to find good people and some quit because they can't live up to the high standards. I don't see the problem.

Fiction can also be analysed. Based on a true story... 'here's everything they got wrong...'

So if the head of a multi billion dollar business or country doesn't have the time to go through every single hire with a fine tooth comb it's because they're lazy or useless? Surely it has nothing to do with spreading the load and responsibility beyond just yourself to make things as efficient as financially possible, which is the point in hiring other people to help. Couldn't have to do with the people doing the hiring making some mistakes because everyone is perfect except for Trump. How is Trump supposed to force congress to do what he wants? Isn't that the key reason congress exists, so that the Prez can't just move ahead with whatever they want?

Trump will continue to have more firings and resignations especially if he serve a second term because soon or later people realize he is an idiot and its best to be out of a job then go down in hell with one.  For the people who get fired, we continue to see a pattern where you here Trump asking them to do either illegal, amoral or just plan stupid things and they say no so they have to go.  The only ones that can survive within a Trump administration are the crooks.

Well, he said he would run the Government like a big company. Never seen a big corporation where the executives ain't crooks, so he's delivering on that point - just differently than most people had in mind, I guess.

Link 1 - Lists one or two firings for most presidents.  Gets to Trump and points out 8 firings with a further 7 resignations. 

Link 2 - Holy crap....did you even read that article or just the headline?  It completely shows just how bad Trump's turnover rate is compared to Obama.

Link 3 - Article focuses more on how long certain cabinet secretaries lasted before fired/resigned.

You should know by now that I will read your links and use them against you if you didn't.

The problem is not the firing people or the resignations in itself, as every President has this to some degree. The problem is the rate at which it happens. Trump has already more of them than many presidents who served 2 terms while he's just halfway through one term.

Do you even read the links you post? Or do you expect others to read them for you and report back?

It almost makes me wonder whether you're actually just a very discreet troll - who keeps it toned down enough to stay under the radar.

I mean the 2nd article's title is 'Trump's Vs. Obama's Resignation Rates Are Truly Mindblowing' and the 2nd sub-heading reads 'COMPARED TO OBAMA, TRUMP HAS LOST TONS OF STAFFERS SO FAR.'

If you're not trolling, I don't really understand why you take the time to endlessly argue these points as you almost never change your position (I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt here by saying almost), even when the evidence you yourself post runs counter to your point...

What's the point in engaging in a public forum when your ideas and opinions are set in stone?

I actually find it satisfying when evidence or an argument forces me to change my stance on something because it means I've learned something - which is what we all should aspire to do - no-one comes out of the womb with all of the answers!

You contribute a lot of time to this forum and come across as a smart enough guy, but trying to move you on a point is like talking to a breeze-block.

Blinkered stubbornness is not a strength.

Who said its not truthful.  Basically you have about 3 books out there from different people.  When all is said and done, its their word over Trumps even though some of the books has quotes from other people within the administration.  Most reasonable people who has followed this administration would have a hard time believing anything coming from Trump since he has a hard time with the truth.  There is no reason to not believe these people because multiple people inside the administration have said the same thing.  If you only believe what Trump says then I would have to believe you have a Messiah complex.

As to your second paragraph, you still throwing out words that has nothing to do with what I stated.  I said top positions. You know, the ones that need the President approval so you can stop with the every single hire nonsense. Lets just limit the scope to the Cabinet positions which is the ones he personally put his signature on.  As always you totally ignore Trump personal statement that he only hires the best people.  I know, its just another thing you can ignore from Trump since it doesn't fit with your defense.

So then why does his administration have revolving door employment when other administrations did not?

Link 1 - Lists one or two firings for most presidents.  Gets to Trump and points out 8 firings with a further 7 resignations. 

Link 2 - Holy crap....did you even read that article or just the headline?  It completely shows just how bad Trump's turnover rate is compared to Obama.

Link 3 - Article focuses more on how long certain cabinet secretaries lasted before fired/resigned.

You should know by now that I will read your links and use them against you if you didn't.

You're back pedaling. 

That would be the opposite of forward pedaling, which is the direction I was moving in, here in upsidownville.

That's because you two speak past each other, not with each other.

You're interpreting his rotating door employment as if no other president has ever fired someone, and pointing out that they do. But SpokenTruth is (like a couple others) just pointing out that it's not that other presidents didn't fire anybody, but didn't have nearly such a high turnover, which you seemingly interpret as delusion that they didn't fire anybody, and the circle starts anew.

Nobody is denying that former presidents also fired staff or had staff resigning. But point out any who did fire so many or had so many resigning on him in such a short amount of time, otherwise your argument falls flat.

They said, "So then why does his administration have revolving door employment when other administrations did not?" Are you saying the threshold for too much turnover is literally tied to Trump? Show me where I said anything close to previous Presidents didn't fire anybody. My point with the links was to specifically show that previous Presidents did in fact do their fair share of firing. Trump firing more in a shorter amount of time doesn't mean other administrations didn't have what you would consider rotating doors at that point in time. That's like asking why does the majority of the population think the world is round when previous generations knew it was flat? I dunno, maybe because things changed between then and now and have to be taken into account.

Nobody seems to be care about that though. Saying Jeff has fired a tonne from his many giant warehouses but grandpa fired way less from the small original back in the day, doesn't make any sense if the amount of employees isn't equal and society has changed. More complexity leads to more problems. Just like all of Jeff's msm and social media problems that his grandpa didn't have. When he grew up he was just another small business and those things didn't even exist.

They said, "So then why does his administration have revolving door employment when other administrations did not?" Are you saying the threshold for too much turnover is literally tied to Trump? Show me where I said anything close to previous Presidents didn't fire anybody. My point with the links was to specifically show that previous Presidents did in fact do their fair share of firing. Trump firing more in a shorter amount of time doesn't mean other administrations didn't have what you would consider rotating doors at that point in time. That's like asking why does the majority of the population think the world is round when previous generations knew it was flat? I dunno, maybe because things changed between then and now and have to be taken into account.

Nobody seems to be care about that though. Saying Jeff has fired a tonne from his many giant warehouses but grandpa fired way less from the small original back in the day, doesn't make any sense if the amount of employees isn't equal and society has changed. More complexity leads to more problems. Just like all of Jeff's msm and social media problems that his grandpa didn't have. When he grew up he was just another small business and those things didn't even exist.