The difference in your comparison is that 3rd party support was great from the beginning for PS4, so if that was its 2nd year support than it would mean most games didnt do too well.

Switch on the other hand had a whopping 17 retail games from March-June of last year, it had about 4 times as many in the same time frame this year.

Context is key, most third parties who have released Switch games are continuing to support it while more and more are announcing games for it. This is a sign that overall 3rd party games are doing well, ill repeat well not great, amazing, spectacular, etc.

Personally I think context is less important than you're making it out to be. There's a difference between "good third party support" and "good third party support for a Nintendo console", I think you're more focused on the "for a Nintendo console" part, whereas I'm putting them all on the same playing field.

Honestly, when it all boils down to it, I think the only thing separating us is how we're defining "well".

Then how about actually stating your definition of well?

I've made that very clear multiple times in this thread.

No you havent.

Asserting something doesn't make it true.

I went through every post of yours in this thread and you never once stated what your definition of selling well is.

All you have done is talk about how people have set the bar low, mocked Rols reading comprehension and made false claims about Vita/Wii U support growing as time went on.

You havent actually stated any of your own opinions on the matter which makes me believe Rols analysis was correct, you just like to argue for the sake of argument.

I don't know what else to tell you. It's written clear as day. Multiple times. In multiple ways. If you can't figure that out, it's on you.