Hiku said:
The point of the Marth discussion never was about Marth. It was about how you claimed that "it doesn't matter that it incentivized Yun to play more aggressively because he was already an aggressive character." When I pointed out that the same thing applies to characters who already were aggressive in Smash in regards to your comment: "everyone in Ultimate universally has to come out and attack regardless of the match up", you magically ignored the point completely, and only talked about Marth. "Pick any aggressive character" I said. But no. Marth, Marth,Marth, Marth, Marth, Marth.
And that pretty much sums up your tactics here.
As fun as it sounds to continue with the endless ambiguation and avoiding the point at all cost, when someone repeatedly answers a simple, specific, question with "I already told you" (I even made a template for you to make it easier), that's a pretty good indication of what's going on.
As such, I'll have to pass.
But it was interesting to hear that you already ruled out the possibility of Marth's meta possibly changing in the way it normally can when going to a traditional new Smash.
|
I'm talked about Marth because you keep bringing the character up that's how a debate works you brought the character up and I responded you still don't get the point on Yun, in SFIV he was already being played in an aggressive manner which undermines your point in how a few options encouraged aggressive play that was the point you then brought up Marth for what ever reason all that's clear is that you bring up random things which ironically you keep tripping over in your arguments.
The irony doesn't stop there as in this post you moan about me going on about Marth then turn around and start talking about the character yourself what's comical is that I didn't even mention anything about meta in the next game it's like you hallucinated an argument in your head and responded to it on the forum.