By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Not getting Battlefield this time around

 

Are you getting Battlefield 5?

Yes 11 25.00%
 
No 33 75.00%
 
Total:44
Chazore said:

I don't mind female soldiers in BFV, because we actually had them in WWII. My main gripe is that EA are simply tossing in dolled up pretty female soldiers (let's be honest, WWII had a lot of non pretty soldiers, both male & female), while ignoring to add in actual well know female soldiers from WWII, like Russia's famous female snipers, or the Night Witches.

 

The advanced prosthetics and camo just make the game more cartoony and akin to Fornite, which isn't a good look for the franchise. 

The British army didn't have women on the frontlines like they showed. Anyways the men to women ratio was skewed towards men moreso than shown in the trailer. This is why it makes no sense to show women in the battlefield and on the box art.



Around the Network

I voted yes but not at launch. Because I don't like the direction they are going I'll be buying it half price on sale likely in December out of protest.



I usually don't care for realism all that much in my games but historical-war games are an exception. I need to be able to recreate battles that are historically accurate otherwise it stops feeling like a historical recreation.



I can no longer support the SJW nonsense. Enough is enough.



ClassicGamingWizzz said:
I think you and others should stop behaving like babys, you dont wany to play it? Good, no One Cares, stop spam the fórum with threads like these

I think it would be hilarious if RDR2 has actual forced diversity and this guy snaps again.



Around the Network

Its a video game. Dony expect it to be accurate. I'll eventually get it.



morenoingrato said:
ClassicGamingWizzz said:
I think you and others should stop behaving like babys, you dont wany to play it? Good, no One Cares, stop spam the fórum with threads like these

I think it would be hilarious if RDR2 has actual forced diversity and this guy snaps again.

RDR2 is mine no matter what. Its not a historically accurate game so they can do anything that makes it amazing.



Ka-pi96 said:
jason1637 said:
Its a video game. Dony expect it to be accurate. I'll eventually get it.

Why not? Why shouldn't people expect and want accurate video games based on history? I mean, I couldn't give a crap about WW2 games, but I'm a big fan of games set during the Medieval or Roman periods and historical accuracy is something that makes those games more enjoyable to me.

An accurate ww2 game would not be fun.



jason1637 said:
Ka-pi96 said:

Why not? Why shouldn't people expect and want accurate video games based on history? I mean, I couldn't give a crap about WW2 games, but I'm a big fan of games set during the Medieval or Roman periods and historical accuracy is something that makes those games more enjoyable to me.

An accurate ww2 game would not be fun.

For everyone within gaming?.



Mankind, in its arrogance and self-delusion, must believe they are the mirrors to God in both their image and their power. If something shatters that mirror, then it must be totally destroyed.

Chazore said:
jason1637 said:

An accurate ww2 game would not be fun.

For everyone within gaming?.

Well, think of all of the real-life aspects of war that aren't represented in games. No going to the bathroom, no attempting to sleep, no boredom as you are transported to the frontlines, no one-death-and-it's-over, no sickness that you have to deal with, etc.