Because France was an occupied country where young males were death/placed in overseas military department or working in a labour camp for the third reich, the french resistance had a big portion of females that's also why if you write french resistance on google you get many WWII resistance pictures of women.  Btw she is also based on a real person helene deschamps who is one of the most well known resistance fighters who also was a spy.  Around the game release she also receive and US Army service medal.  If anything she was probably one if not the toughest resistance fighters.

I'm not sure if the computer science being seen as a "Man's Job" is so much a thing anymore.

Look at this situation. A male nurse and female computer programmer.

I would say the male nurse has a good working environment, yet outside of work gets ripped on for being in a 'woman's field'

The female I could see as being in a more hostile work environment, yet praised outside of work. (By hostile work environment I mean such as being the 1 women in an office of 10 men being unconsciously leered at, hearing sexual jokes not aimed at her, ect.) Nothing may be intentional, but hostile non the less.

I would say something like "construction" is a job that would be more labeled "Man's Field" than computer sciences.

I gave a link earlier with multiple sources, statistics and a break down of the info and the monkey study. You provided polls of women's feelings about stem, a historical article with no source and studies that seem more like polls.... We're debating nature vs nurture not feelings.

The first software developer was Ada Lovelace -> a woman.

My boss is a structural engineer woman. I had good bosses guys and good bosses women and bad bosses women and bad bosses man.

There are guys I know that would not work for a woman. I don't give a shit. They are equal for me in terms of jobs capabilities and accountability.

 lI could not care less of a crap if women are all around in media.

Is different at minimum. Difference stimulates creativity.

Move on with your life.

Don't be afraid and complaining of losing you masculine identity all the time and crying about women taking on the media movies game whatever you play on your ass seated down.

That is not manly. That is childish.

It’s kind of weird o be ranting against film trends in the late 70s through 1980s in 2018.

The first one doesn't really mean anything because society is not obligated to provide female professors so they perform better because of biased feelings involving sexes. The writer's conclusion is idiotic.

 With the second one, they would have to ask people questions about themselves to figure out if they "under psychological threat", a "negatively stereotyped" person, etc. School tests are based on performance and can't be biased. If a person doesn't try as hard because of their own self doubt, that's on them. With any field that's competitive, there's gonna be alot of pressure and some people just don't do well in that environment. 

The monkey study is just a part of what I linked and it's meant to be in context with the rest. You're ignoring the rest which is alot stronger evidence in showing that women and men have natural preferences that play the biggest role in choosing professions.

The majority of women don't want x otherwise they'd be doing it. There's no boundaries for them to get any career they want. Even if we made everything as suited as much to women in schooling/training, they'd still prefer certain careers over others. I don't care if there's "not enough" women in certain careers because it's due to natural occurring preferences and not some conspiracy theory plot by men to stop women from having any good jobs. It's not the job of any government to get so involved in people's lives that they're interested in socially engineering people to correct them. If women want to work in certain fields, let 'em.

Its real. Women aren't interested in science in the same numbers as men. They aren't into entrepreneurship as men are because they'd rather do a safe and secure job with timely hours. You'll see women talking about themselves as a gender not getting equal oppurtunities but ask them their personal preferences and the differences are visible.

But why is that the case? We can't just say it's the case and leave it at that, we have to figure out if it's biologically-related or socially-related.

Anecdotal but it may have to do with both. Men have to be successful financially to get a partner so they are inclined towards entrepreneurship to get success, fame and women. Women aren't expected to do such things and they don't need to be successful in their career to get a partner. Men are expected to be funny while looking good to attract a mate so they develop their sense of humour. Women are expected to be motherly and don't need to be logical so they see little gains from going into the sciences. It is socially structured as a result of biology and nature itself suggests so.

A study showed that women have IQ's close to a 100 with little deviation towards the high and low end while men's IQ is spread across the spectrum. This is why most business people and astrophysicists are men while most people in mental asylums are men as well. It makes sense, men are throwaway by nature as 1 man can impregnate many women for the growth of the populace but every woman is needed to give birth to children so nature is experimental with men.