In regards to the rumour no it's not a bust yet as it never actually said a Direct was going to happen on May 7th that was the OP who said that, the actual rumour said online details would emerge which they did and got things quite spot on.

Not quite spot on. An exact release date of September 24th was not given, they're not using Discord for voice chat, and while they did say no more VC, they didn't say it was being replaced.

He didn't say discord was being used though he just said through an existing chat service and that discord is the most popular indicating that they may had been looking into options before sticking with the app he didn't actually say it was being used.

Then it's confirmed. :)

Even if you wanna read it like that, spot on still isn't correct. Even if it was 100% correct, that doesn't mean the rest of the rumor is anymore likely to be true. But fine, wont say the E3 part of the rumor is bust just because the online bit wasn't perfectly accurate. Will however still say it's a bust due to the E3 rumors being utter nonsense. I think it's clear that the original 4chan source got wind of the online service info dropping May 7th but knows nothing beyond that. They tried to put that one morsel of truth inside a sandwich of BS to make the whole thing believable and gain temporary fame. It's the March direct all over again.

Fact is he's got more right than some want to give him credit for even predicting the day online details would be revealed whether the rest is true remains to be seen but as it stands official events have backed his claims whether you want to dismiss the rest of what he says the rumour has shown to have some credibility.

Wow, this guy nailed it. He said that Nintendo would announce online details on May 7th and they did. He said that Virtual Console wouldn't come to Switch and he was right. Guessing his E3 leak is right as well then.

So, based on the name for Fire Emblem, Lustrous Daybreak, I'm guessing it's a remake of Radiant Dawn, or possibly a sequel to it? Lustrous Daybreak is just synonyms for Radiant Dawn afterall. 

Pokemon being a gen 1 remake wouldn't surprise me, matches with some earlier leaks as well as the leaked screenshot. Hopefully he's right about the graphics being midway between Sun/Moon and Pokken, because the leaked screenshot looked barely better than Sun/Moon, though maybe it was from an early build before they finished the graphics. 

No one is denying that they were right about the date, but again that isn't the end all. The E3 details aren't realistic and we've had leaks that got some things right but most everything else wrong before, these facts shouldn't be glossed over either.

That's exactly it, Lustrous Daybreak is the same name, which means it could only be a remake, but we already know Fire Emblem Switch is a brand new game. Even though the date turned out correct, this alone still debunks the E3 portion of the leak, especially when the rest of it is similarly flawed. The 3DS Pokemon games pushed the system to it's limits. Doesn't necessarily mean Pokemon will push the Switch in the same way, but it makes little sense that they suddenly cheap out on graphics for a series they know it's safe to put high production values into. Even Kirby got a huge step up from it's 3DS days, and they said Fire Emblem will aswell.

Im not saying youre wrong, i think the leak is fake as well.....but wouldnt being between S/M & Pokken be a huge visual leap?

I personally don't think the Fire Emblem name single-handedly debunks it, it could just be a direct sequel to Radiant Dawn.

I wouldn't use him saying Pokemon's graphics are only a half step for debunking purposes either, Gamefreak are frankly kind of lazy. There's a reason why the DS Pokemon games look pretty much the same as the Gameboy Advance Pokemon games even though DS was a good bit more powerful. Halfway between Sun/Moon and Pokken is actually better graphics than I'm personally expecting, though obviously I'm hoping for Pokken tier graphics. The recent leaked screenshot barely looked better than Sun/Moon, hopefully it was fake (though I do hope they replaced random encounters with visible Pokemon and allow you to have your lead Pokemon out of it's ball like the screenshot suggests): 

In between S/M and Pokken is a very wide window, could mean it looks as good as PS3 game or only as good as a GCN game, but the big take away is that it doesn't look as good as Pokken. No way Pokemon Switch isn't on par with other 1st party releases I say.