No, PC ver will be superior to ps4 ver

Well you are not wrong.But you already know my stance about these companies that have/had strong ties with Nintendo and their initial stance with the Switch.Any business venture is risky, but they had(Square for example) a much better chance of sucess due to their history with the company, and thus had the fanbase, and had a compelling software that could be put there.And with little competition, could have made quite the headway into carving its own market on the platform.But as I said, you already know my opinion about this and its not that you are wrong or I am right or vice versa, it simply seems/was a missed oportunity.

And sorry for the late reply, went travelling this past weekend.

Weird decision about the 3ds. JRPGs normally sell well on that platform even in the West

If the technical issues are really demanding, hard to deal with, then it would make a lot more sense releasing the 3ds version and leaving the Switch version aside for the West.... 

Sorry for the late reply.Just shortly after you replied to me, I went travelling with my family, and returned just yesterday.Sorry if I couldnt answer any faster, but I had to be in a PC to properly reply to you.

I understand what you mean, but I think you are generalizing things.Overall, I agree with you.Depending on the thread/discussion you are having, the more detailed your post is, the better it is for the overall discussion.The problem about forums and text based communication is that you dont have the body language to rely upon, in which is where the details of conversations are communicated, such as sarcasm, uncertainty, superiority in relation to another, and so on.So for that same meaning to be passed upon correctly through a means of communication that only uses letters and words, you need to use more details, so that your message, whatever you want to say, is understood more clearly.So yeah, I do agree with you on that.

The point I was initially trying to make, and is exclusively related to that, is that in this thread, about that specific subject, a more detailed post was simply not needed to convey its message.As you said, there could be problems such as the reader not reading the OP and thus not understanding fully what the user meant, but then thats not the user problem.Thats the reader problem, because it is assumed and rightfully so, by the one that post something on the thread, that everyone knows the contents of the OP.If you start assuming things and cover all ground, you could go forever like that.Maybe the one reading dosent understand what imo means?Then you would need to write "in my opinion" everytime.Maybe they dont understand english?Well, its better to translate to all major languages what you mean then.Maybe you end up using some word that is racist in some other country by accident, like jap is for the japanese(just learned that).Well then, you better know all slurs there is to know so that you are completely and utterly politically correct to everyone.I know I used some extreme examples, but you get what I mean.

So then I think that posts in threads should be as complete as the thread requires.If its a more serious discussion, that a more complete post is probably required.If its a more casual thread, like this, then a more casual answer is probably more appropriate(read it as not as complete and full of details).The problem with the internet is that we wouldnt be having these kind of discussions in real life, because if you were to trying to "impose"(its not what you are doing, relax.Not criticizing you or anything) what people should say or how should they say without a good motive, people would get bored of you, bully you, stop talking to you, etc.There would be real consequences that affect your life.But in the internet, its everything very distant, unconsequencional.No people are more feel more safe and easy to say the first thing that comes to their mind without thinking twice.And thats why we need moderatiors or stuff like that.But Im going wayyyyyyy offtrack with this and its actually a whole different discussion.

.......Not really.3DS sales are declining, but most importantly its software are starting to move very few units.While on the other hand, Switch is breaking sales recortds and developers are clamoring left and right that their games are selling really well on the Switch.

Betwenn 3DS and Switch, the Switch version is a no brainer.Beyond obvious really.But given that the 3DS version was already developed and the game would already be translated due to the dialogue not being different from the one in the PS4 version(as far as I know), this feels like and odd decision.

ah, right. I see your point. Taking advantage of the popularity of the platform to boost sales.

To me, it´s somewhat dissapointing.... I was really hoping to play that game on the 3ds. 

still waiting on a collectors announcement,square

I know I won't be able to convince you because you already made up your mind even with hard evidence. You still think that way. 
But then again I won't stop defending the decision of some 3rd party devs. because it happen before with PS4, it happened with Switch now and most likely it will happen with PS5. Also,  if you look at PS4  before then compare it to Switch now. Switch has a better JP 3rd party support than PS4 in it's early years. 

That's also how  JP3rd party operates now. The PS1, PS2, DS and 3DS era is over. 
The market is very different now and it will be a hard transition for a lot of JP3rd party devs. They will maximize PS4 and Vita to the last drop and same thing will happen with Switch. Unless PS5 or NSw2 will change that because normally a lot Japanese games don't sell well that's why they limit their budget so they can profit. 

Some publisher will wait some will not. It might not good for a specific fanbase but if this 3rd party devs will still support my platform even with PS5 being released that's okay because I will transition to the next when I am ready because buying a new hardware expecting a lot of JP3rd party games  early on is very unwise.

Adding voice acting expands the game size greatly and I'm sure Square Enix and other companies, western or Japanese, won't release their big sized games until Nintendo approves the 64GB cart. So i can see the 'much later' being late 2019 since the cards wont be ready until Q1 2019.

Who is the new JRPG-King (after Persona 5) this year ?

Dragon Quest XI, Ni No Kuni 2 or Kingdom Hearts 3 ? very exciting DAY 1 = All 3.