Well that's the thing. I'm not the one trying to win. I merely pointed out to the other user "in your opinion" and called it a day, but you stepped in and we ended up dragging this out. Eventually to a point where an agree to disagree was forced.

The reason I disagree to that, is that I would redact what I had previously said, but I do not. I pointed out that there were cases of it happening all over the net and this site being no different. Because I've seen it happening on here, I cannot label it as the exception.

It wasn't even a remark as you put it. It was merely me pointing out "in your opinion", which was the main part I was trying to convey. 

@bolded; No, I wasn't really up for dragging something as simple as forgetting to mention "imo" out as long as this. I didn't feel like the "harassment" comment was necessary, so I naturally decided to take it down the road it was heading toward. I mentioned the SJW part because believe it or not (rule, norm or anything else), thaty group like to act like anything towards them is a form of harassment, which was why I saw it as such to mention SJW. 

Mmn, that last part is telling me that because you didn't get that nice discussion, you now want to turn it into something else (I can definitely feel it in that last part).

Like I said before. I'm not going to agree to disagree, we can just disagree and be done with it, but I'm not backing down from calling the other user on not using "imo" (hell we have another user pulling the same thing in regards to their system getting JRPG's).

In your opinion.

Others will consider the game being best on their respective platforms in one way or another.

Thats the crux of the problem to be quite honest.I still think that those japanese companies that have good relations with Nintendo "sinned" in not jumping in early on the Switch, or at least gave it an honest try, even though Square kind of did with Octopath and some somewhat decent port of the DQ musou games.But if you had to choose betwenn the two evils of not announcing anything until its ready, or announcing it but having barely anything put together, the first one should always have the preference.

Until we know what the Switch version will be like, it's hard to claim that the Switch version will be inferior.
For example, it may have lower quality visuals, and an extra story mode where you play through a portion of the game as the main villain. I would probably prefer that version, if that was the case.
Resident Evil 4 was like that, where the PS2 version had lower visual quality than the GC version, but they added the ability to play through Ada's story in Separate Ways, which I much preferred, as it added something to the overall experience. (You learn that it was Ada who rang the church bell to save Leon in the beginning, etc.)

Because the Switch version will come out so late, it's plausible they may add some extras to make up for it.

That and developing a PC port that they can release at the same time as the PS4 version. I imagine that was the most intensive part of localization.

Its possible to pirate on the PS4 version especially with the latest exploit l0l.

@OT - Great news - shame about the 3DS version being canned in the west - will eventually emulate it but will buy the Steam version in the future.

Hoping for DQ5 and DQ8 to come out.