I'm not going to get into an argument with you about it here.  But, your statement is both true and false.   

Administration costs are extremely high in the USA.  That's true.  And, it is due, in large part, to regulatory compliance.  Those multiple insurance companies that providers have to deal with - they all have a mountain of rules to follow in each state, some localities, and federally.  That means they have to collect a ton of info from every claimant.  They're legally required to have burdensome processes. etc, etc, etc.  

(It should also be noted that there are now three or fewer major insurers per state, on average)

As for drug prices...... its a hell of a lot more expensive to bring drugs to market in the USA than anywhere else in the world.  Yet, nobody on planet earth is experiencing an epidemic of unsafe (legal) drugs.  So, lowering costs would not result in a significant drop in safety. 

Australia, it's a better version of the US

Australia here

Healthcare:
On the cusp of a US style system, thanks to Howard's LHC reforms. Essentially, they class it as an incentive to buy private health (if by "incentive", they mean "do it, or we'll increase your medicare loading, AND make it more expensive to buy it later). Those prices are skyrocketing, and at the same time private benefits are being removed (Bupa just removed knee and hip surgeries, as well as pregnancy care). Those "unprofitable" benefits will be forced back on to Medicare (which will eventually come through in a future govt/Murdoch article as "Medicare unsustainable").

Guns:
This is probably the one thing I WILL give Howard credit for. It took a lot guts to implement policy that contradcited with a lot of their party's platform. I live near a gun store, and I feel safe that no random person can wander in, buy a gun without a background check, and fire it off in public as soon as they're out the door.

Economy:
Impressed. It appears pretty stable, despite what opposition leaders like Abbott would want you to think. We cleared the last recession pretty well.

Politics:
Shit circus. Just like everywhere else.

Healthcare in the USA sucks, it needs universal health care.

It also needs background checks for people who want to purchase guns at the federal level. At least here in California we have strict gun control laws.

United States

1. Healthcare: The quality is high, but the costs and logistics are a nightmare. My greatest fear is losing health insurance and spending hundreds of thousands of dollars to stay alive if I didn't find employment with same quality insurance.  If there would be a reason for me to move to a foreign country, this would be it. I fully endorse Medicare for All or Universal Healthcare.

2. I think where we draw the line on what guns or weapons make sense to own or not is the issue.  A pistol, shotgun, or rifle can be explained for defense, sporting, or hunting.  I don't understand need of a AK-47, M-16, or AR-15.  Clearly other shave a line or we could all buy nuclear warheads at the store, difference is where the line is drawn.

Funnily enougth the NHS is ranked 1st in the world two years running.

In Brazil the healthcare isn't the best, but still cost a lot of taxpayer money, so the government could make itself smaller and cheaper.

Gun control just prevent law abiding citizen to have guns and we know they won't ever be able to make it near impossible for criminals to get then, so they should allow anyone that isn't criminal or mentally ill to have a gun.

Gun laws in Belgium are strict but well thought out.

First, to own and buy a weapon, you must be a recognized hunter or hobby/sport shooter.
So you need to have a hunters permit or have passed an exam as sport shooter before you can purchase your own weapon.

Note that permissable weapons are devided in four categories: carbines, pistoles and revolvers, dubbleshot shotguns and blackpowder weapons (automatic rifles and combat shotguns are also banned for civilian use). You need to do an exam for every category of weapon you plan to own and or use (so just because you have a permit for a carbine does not mean you can buy a dubbleshot).

Once you have a permit, you can buy as many weapons as you like, but every gun must be registered after purchase with the police. Furthermore, there are permit renewals every 5 years (which is usually just a formality) and there are laws considering how to store weapons at home and what kind of storage capacity and safety measures are required depending on the amount of weapons you have.

That's Belgium's gun law in a nutshell.

1 - It's cheaper to pay for your own medical care than to pay the government to do it, and people not being taxed could save that money

2 - Second amendment reason for creation is to fight the tyrannic government, so if they can have that gun so you should as well, unless you think it's possible for the population to defend against the government using only revolvers.

In Luxembourg:

Gun control: Very repressive, you even need a permit for a archery bow or dulled fantasy swords. However, this means armed attacks are exceedingly rare, and security agents are generally unarmed. I far prefer this to looser gun laws as any kinds of attacks are generally just fisticuffs or knifefights at worst.

Health care: A bit special here. You first have to pay in full up front, but you get part or all of your money back, exept on medicine where the percentage is already applied when bought with a presciption. On antibiotics for instance, 80% are paid back to you, painkillers and symptom soothers 40-60%, vitamins and food supplements are always full price even with a prescription.

For hospital stay and other kinds of chiurgic medicine (like dental), the national healthcare system provides a high standard, but for those who want more, there are private healthcare companies who you can subscribe to to get their services.