By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Opinion: The Witcher 3 is boring, confusing, bad written and bad directed, etc...

I agree OP. It's a boring game with uninteresting lore and it feels like it drags on forever. Not to mention the combat mechanics are terrible. Geralt controls like a tank who has a permanent Slow curse on him, whereas it should feel swift and involving. I gave up mid-way through. My time is better spent elsewhere.



Around the Network

seeing ppl critique witchers dialogue n story...but praising stuff like skyrim,fallout masseffect,persona and mgs story n dialogue? eeeeh different strokes for different folks i guess those games are good but story/dialogue is not the strong suit of none of them n some of them have downright laughable dialogue



h2ohno said:
The main point of the combat in the Witcher series is the preparation beforehand. Having the right potions and blade coatings and knowing which blades and spells to use is more important than the actual combat. That's true for every game in the series.

And I love that about the combat. I am puzzled when people say the combat in witcher 3 is terrible. I absolutely loved the combat and the preparation i had to be beforehand



KazumaKiryu said:
Dark_Feanor said:

So guys, 6 months trying to enjoy any of the 40 hours I have to quit. 

I can´t take anymore how dull and unfocused this game is, with pointless side quests that lead to nowhere. NO NO NO. 

I even decided to do something I never do with RPG and follow only the main quest... but NO... the main quest is even more boring and confusing. 

I could get away with the bad dialogue, bad camera work, bad facial animation, bad physics, or a skill tree that makes no sense.  But I can´t stand how confusing the world is, how forgettable and pointless the characters are, how long and derivates the quests are, how useless are your decisions.

To be honest .. I agree. Personally, I find "Witcher 3" mediocre, especially the dialogue / story / staging boring. That's why I sold it (after 17 hours of play).

There are games like Persona 5, Yakuza Zero, Metal Gear Solid 3, which touch the players extremely. People cry, laugh, have fun and become fascinated.
The tension, interesting characters and dialogues are incredibly strong. But witcher 3.. oh no -.-

I assume you're pretty much in the minority thinking that way. I actually think TW3 has some of the most touching and meaningful stories to tell in all of gaming and it's the main reason why it is getting so much praise.

 

Baddman said: 
h2ohno said: 
The main point of the combat in the Witcher series is the preparation beforehand. Having the right potions and blade coatings and knowing which blades and spells to use is more important than the actual combat. That's true for every game in the series.

And I love that about the combat. I am puzzled when people say the combat in witcher 3 is terrible. I absolutely loved the combat and the preparation i had to be beforehand

That's because you understood the combat for what it wanted to be, not for what YOU wanted it to be. You're right, preparation is everything in TW3 as it was in the past two games.



Yeah, the writing is awful and the general mechanics feel clunky but I still enjoyed exploring the world. If you haven't tried either Dragon's Dogma or Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning, you might want to pick those up.



 

The PS5 Exists. 


Around the Network
Errorist76 said:
KazumaKiryu said:

To be honest .. I agree. Personally, I find "Witcher 3" mediocre, especially the dialogue / story / staging boring. That's why I sold it (after 17 hours of play).

There are games like Persona 5, Yakuza Zero, Metal Gear Solid 3, which touch the players extremely. People cry, laugh, have fun and become fascinated.
The tension, interesting characters and dialogues are incredibly strong. But witcher 3.. oh no -.-

I assume you're pretty much in the minority thinking that way. I actually think TW3 has some of the most touching and meaningful stories to tell in all of gaming and it's the main reason why it is getting so much praise.

 

Baddman said: 

And I love that about the combat. I am puzzled when people say the combat in witcher 3 is terrible. I absolutely loved the combat and the preparation i had to be beforehand

That's because you understood the combat for what it wanted to be, not for what YOU wanted it to be. You're right, preparation is everything in TW3 as it was in the past two games.

How am I, as a newbie to the series, supposed to know this. The game doesn't give you any indication that I remember. Seems like bad game design to me.



Sales prediction, PS4: 122 Million, Xbox one: 50 million, Switch: 105 million. 

Lenny93 said:
Errorist76 said:

I assume you're pretty much in the minority thinking that way. I actually think TW3 has some of the most touching and meaningful stories to tell in all of gaming and it's the main reason why it is getting so much praise.

 

That's because you understood the combat for what it wanted to be, not for what YOU wanted it to be. You're right, preparation is everything in TW3 as it was in the past two games.

How am I, as a newbie to the series, supposed to know this. The game doesn't give you any indication that I remember. Seems like bad game design to me.

I know, it’s sounds like a strange concept, but read the manual.



shikamaru317 said:
Slimebeast said:
I agree wholehartedly. I can't stand Witcher 3 and I don't see anything good with it apart from the purely technical qualities like graphics and animation.

Yes, in particular it pisses me off because of its ultra-modern cynical and nihilistic moral and culture, where everyone is so aware and conscious. Everyone has a bad mouth, everyone is perverted. It tries to be so edgy, it's so damn politically correct that I want to vomit, the people in this world have the same mindset and awareness of human rights, social issues and the modern progressive worldview, just like the most conscious inner city New Yorker, despite this supposedly being kings and peasants living in a medieval fantasy world.

Witcher 3 stands for everything wrong in our modern world. It's about pissing on everything that is beautiful and decent. It has no respect for history and tradition.

There are also awful game design aspects I hate about Withcher 3, where it tries to be Red Dead Redemption rather than an RPG. It's not really an RPG at all. It uses so much smoke and mirrors when it comes to progression, leveling, items, skills and stats. Many cynical game mechanics, but I can't bother to go them through. I just get sad at mankind because so few have spotted this cynical design philosophy.

How the heck is Witcher 3, of all the games out there, the game you choose to call politically correct? As someone who cannot abide by politcal correctness in the slightest, I don't see it as politically correct at all, in fact I'd say it's anti-politically correct. In a world where feminists hate on any female game character that is sexualized in any way, shape, or form, CD Projekt fights back by making the majority of of female main characters in the series attractive. All of the sorceresses in the series are attractive and wear revealing outfits. Prostitution, not politically correct, yet you can visit whore houses in the game whenever you want to. Violence, not politcally correct, yet Witcher 3 is one of the most violent games I've ever played. The list goes on and on. 

Now Bioware RPG's, those have become massively politically correct, to the point where I'm finding it more and more difficult to play them. 

This. So much this. It's as if Slimebeast is a visitor from opposite world, where everything is backwards. Wow.



Slimebeast said:
shikamaru317 said:

How the heck is Witcher 3, of all the games out there, the game you choose to call politically correct? As someone who cannot abide by politcal correctness in the slightest, I don't see it as politically correct at all, in fact I'd say it's anti-politically correct. In a world where feminists hate on any female game character that is sexualized in any way, shape, or form, CD Projekt fights back by making the majority of of female main characters in the series attractive. All of the sorceresses in the series are attractive and wear revealing outfits. Prostitution, not politically correct, yet you can visit whore houses in the game whenever you want to. Violence, not politcally correct, yet Witcher 3 is one of the most violent games I've ever played. The list goes on and on. 

But that is politically correct. It just doesn't censor things like SJWs do.

It portrays all the things you listed as negative things. Anti-politically correct would be to glorify beauty, the upper class ladies, prostition and sex and violence. But Witcher 3 is this clichéd "look how dirty and miserable our world is (because it's really a reflection of our world and all that is considered wrong in it by those who are politically correct)". The Witcher 3 is cultural critique against hierarchies, tradition, inequality, selfishness etc.

But the attractive sorceresses, I'll give them that perhaps. They're a bit too attractive and feminine to be considered 100% politically correct. But they'll tone down the sexyness of the sorceresses until their next game.

The world in Witcher 3 is a reflection of not our modern world (per se, of course one can always draw parallels), but our medieval past. And that past was miserable for the common peasant. Poor, filthy, disease ridden, unfair and brutal. No wonder people are having a hard time. It's not as if they had to come up with all the misery, they simply portray what the reality of that era was. Anti-correctness doesn't mean that you have to revel in ugly things, it simply means that you don't pretend that they don't exist. The game doesn't glorify anything, it actually gives a rather balanced portrayal of all levels in society. Not every rich guy is an asshole and not every poor guy is a noble paragon. Even the emperor is a complex character, not just "pure evil". And the main protagonist is something of an antihero. Everybody is simply trying to survive with what they've got. Of course there are the added fantasy elements and within that framework they have come up with the elves being oppressed and such, but it's part of the lore and history of the world. To me it was an interesting way of bringing social tension to the mix and you can choose for yourself whether you want to see elves as a threat or not, it's not really spelled out for you. The point seems to be that everyone should be judged individually, not as groups, and that is the antithesis of everything that the SJW crowd is trying to push. Politically correct the game is not, far from it. Female characters are sexy but yet strong in the right way, demonstrating that strong female doesn't mean a bland everywoman who Mary Sues her way through every obstacle just because. Whorehouses and such are a common thing, as they would have been in a medieval setting, that's why there's no need to either frown upon them them or glorify them, they are simply a part of life. You can choose whether your hero makes use of their services or not. As a contrast, Bioware has gone full correct with its unsolicited expositions of politics and sexuality, that's why the Witcher was a breath of fresh air for me. Sure, it does have its own take on some issues, but it is very subtle and natural instead of rubbing it in your face. Bioware says "X is wrong and you should think like Y", whereas CDPR says "this is the real shit, make up your own mind as to what you want to make of it".



foodfather said:
I agree.

I'm convinced people only like it because it tries to be ''edgy'' and has titays.

I find the writing in particular quite woeful.

The only people who think "edgy" is a thing in videogames are the people who never play adult games. For the rest of us it's nothing special, it's a staple in many of these games. It's not the reason to play anything, it's just one facet of adult themes alongside violence and gore and whatnot. Sex is a normal adult thing, you know?