zorg1000 said:
So if you agree that what i said is believable than what was the point of your original snarky response to me? |
Sometimes being snark is an end in itself you know. Also I was more under the impression that you didn't think RoW would be overtracked if we just increased Europe at that time (7 and 10M announcements), but sure for end of year it may be somewhat undertracked if the split remains the same.
RolStoppable said:
It's not necessary to be the fastest selling console in history to do well and I didn't even hint at Switch being the fastest selling console in Europe as a whole. Why the PS4 comparison is flawed has already been explained. The XB1 comparison is flawed because it is known that Microsoft has problems in mainland Europe, but not in the UK. Nintendo has no historical lopsided sales trends in Europe like Microsoft does, that's why the comparison doesn't work. |
Sure it isn't necessary. But if we use France being 25% of the market to put Europe numbers up, for it to hold the percentage on marketshare it would also need to be fast in all other European markets.
Nintendo doesn't have issues on Europe, still if I'm not wrong aren't you on the wagon that think Japan and USA advantage Switch have will be higher than PS4 that only have "one market" lead over Switch?
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."