By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
RolStoppable said:
DonFerrari said: 

Sure it isn't necessary. But if we use France being 25% of the market to put Europe numbers up, for it to hold the percentage on marketshare it would also need to be fast in all other European markets.

Nintendo doesn't have issues on Europe, still if I'm not wrong aren't you on the wagon that think Japan and USA advantage Switch have will be higher than PS4 that only have "one market" lead over Switch?

I didn't use 25% in any of my posts. All I said is that if Switch is doing incredibly in France, it's safe to say that Switch is doing at least fine in all other major European countries. Hence why Switch is doing well overall in Europe.

As for PS4 vs. Switch lifetime, Switch doing well in Europe supports the prediction of an overall Switch victory, so what's your train of logic by asking this question? Switch winning in Japan by ~10m and in America by ~10m while losing in Europe by ~10m, that gives Switch the advantage.

If you assume Switch will be over 10M for USA and Japan, with PS4 being 10M ahead in Europe and nothing in RoW, then sure Switch would win... now if that will really happen, that isn't really anything certain.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."