Pemalite said:
That is the real kicker isn't it? The majority of games that will be run on a Playstation 4 Pro are... *Drumroll* base Playstation 4 games.
Well. Sony and Microsoft should force requirements for their "premium" machines to have some sort of improvement over the base machine going forward. |
Sure demanding better version is something they shall do. But determine what is the specs is bad. As I said some games will benefit more of resolution, performance or effects. But demanding all 4k60fps on the platform will make the dev cuts in other places that may make the experience inferior than the base version.
Mr Puggsly said:
And again, you knew I meant console exclusive while the PC audience is not a direct competitor per se. Which is why PC sometimes shares games even when a company buys exclusivity. Your personal voice wasn't asked for and I didn't respond to it. I'm speaking in more general terms so your personal thoughts will mostly be ignored. Might as well go talk to a wall at that rate. Switch hasn't really gotten the big Japanese support yet. It'll come but that's a market Sony and Nintendo primarily fight for. Xbox just gets some of it because it has an audience, easy to port and extra money, like FFXV and MGSV. X1 may be a minority console but it still has a very viable userbase, unlike Wii U which ultimately killed Nintendo in the home console arena. Switch is simply doubling down on handheld which was always successful. So you played SNES Classic more than X1? What does that even prove? Odds are you played games found on X1 but on other platforms. This is why your anecdotal comments add nothing, you're simply out of touch. "I played multiplat games on other machines so therefore X1 has nothing to play." This is basically your logic and its an ignorant perspective. |
The exclusives Consoles share with PC when not talking about Xbox, are firstly 3rd party content and 2nd companies saving on costs of exclusivity by not making it totally exclusive. And we do know the company that decided to do this type of deal.
So since X1 doesn't have exclusives and PS4 have more 3rd parties than X1 is PS4 a better platform then?
Mr Puggsly said:
You know I meant console exclusive. PC is not 8treated as direct competitor. You can even play PS4 exclusives on PC thanks to PS Now and ports. You cared enough to share your personal views and I didnt respond to it. So dont bother wasting the time. Im saying Switch will get Japanese support but Xbox gets some as well. Especially content that appeals to the west. Which might skip Switch. Hence, Switch doesent get notable multiplat content like Xbox. MS has games coming and even Sony has reduced its number of studios. Saying SNES classic has original games is like saying Xbox BC has original games. Boy, what a dumb comment. Again, youre making arguments that simply show youre out of touch. People are playing multiplat games on Xbox. Thats why it keeps getting games. |
Compare emulation and PSNow that comes a gen later to games being on the other platform day 1 is silly.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."