By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - DigitalFoundry: Super Mario Odyssey on Switch: The Complete Tech Analysis

Goodnightmoon on 26 October 2017
bigtakilla said:
Goodnightmoon said:

Are you for real? It wasn't obvious enough seeing that analisys that game stays stable almost all the fucking time? No is not an exact number, but is probably very close to reality.

Hey, just asking. Point is it does have dips, and for a Nintendo game doesn't really live up to their golden standard set by.... Well them, themselves. I even said most won't care, I don't expect you to.

I really don't know if you are serious or just trolling, they just released on of their most ambitious games ever at a practically flawless level of performance and great graphics, and this is what you get out of this? Fucking unbelieveble. 



Around the Network
bigtakilla on 26 October 2017
Goodnightmoon said:
bigtakilla said:

Hey, just asking. Point is it does have dips, and for a Nintendo game doesn't really live up to their golden standard set by.... Well them, themselves. I even said most won't care, I don't expect you to.

I really don't know if you are serious or just trolling, they just released on of their most ambitious games ever at a practically flawless level of performance and great graphics, and this is what you get out of this? unbelieveble. 

Most ambitious game ever? I'm now wondering if you are trolling....



Goodnightmoon on 26 October 2017
bigtakilla said:
Goodnightmoon said:

I really don't know if you are serious or just trolling, they just released one of their most ambitious games ever at a practically flawless level of performance and great graphics, and this is what you get out of this? unbelieveble. 

Most ambitious game ever? I'm now wondering if you are trolling....

I said "One of their most"

And the only reason i didn't said the most is because BoTW exists.

And yet here you are nitpicking shit cause the game has some rare dips where it falls like 3 frames, mindblowing.



bigtakilla on 26 October 2017
Goodnightmoon said:
bigtakilla said:

Most ambitious game ever? I'm now wondering if you are trolling....

I said "One of their most"

And the only reason i dodn't said the most is because BoTW exists.

And yet here you are nitpicking shit

Are you saying no older games have shown more ambition? 

What I'm saying is this seems par for the course for Nintendo to push the envelope. 



ThisGuyFooks on 26 October 2017
Goodnightmoon said:
bigtakilla said:

Hey, just asking. Point is it does have dips, and for a Nintendo game doesn't really live up to their golden standard set by.... Well them, themselves. I even said most won't care, I don't expect you to.

I really don't know if you are serious or just trolling, they just released on of their most ambitious games ever at a practically flawless level of performance and great graphics, and this is what you get out of this? Fucking unbelieveble. 

Ive never seen you discuss anything on this site with a calm attitude when someone doesnt agree with your opinion dude.

Chill, this board is made to have fun and interact with others in a peaceful manner.

IMO You should drop the "Whoever is not with me, is against me" attitude, he is not saying that the game sucks, just pointing out something that Digital Foundry said, which is the point of this thread.



Around the Network
Goodnightmoon on 26 October 2017
ThisGuyFooks said:
Goodnightmoon said:

I really don't know if you are serious or just trolling, they just released on of their most ambitious games ever at a practically flawless level of performance and great graphics, and this is what you get out of this? Fucking unbelieveble. 

Ive never seen you discuss anything on this site with a calm attitude when someone doesnt agree with your opinion dude.

Chill, this board is made to have fun and interact with others in a peaceful manner.

IMO You should drop the "Whoever is not with me, is against me" attitude, he is not saying that the game sucks, just pointing out something that Digital Foundry said, which is the point of this thread.

He is being negative for the sake of being negative, I hate when people does that, you can keep your advises for you btw, I'll be chill when I want to be chill.



ThisGuyFooks on 26 October 2017
Goodnightmoon said:
ThisGuyFooks said:

Ive never seen you discuss anything on this site with a calm attitude when someone doesnt agree with your opinion dude.

Chill, this board is made to have fun and interact with others in a peaceful manner.

IMO You should drop the "Whoever is not with me, is against me" attitude, he is not saying that the game sucks, just pointing out something that Digital Foundry said, which is the point of this thread.

He is being negative for the sake of being negative, I hate when people does that, you can keep your advises for you btw, I'll be chill when I want to be chill.

LMAO

Alrighty then.



Zekkyou on 26 October 2017
bigtakilla said:
Zekkyou said:

To be fair (hurr), SMO does appear to be far more technically ambitious than the average 60fps Nintendo title. So while the overall performance profile is sub-standard for them, i don't think it's from a lack of effort. If they'd been more technically conservative like in Splatoon 2, MK8D, ARMS, etc, i expect we'd be seeing their more standard results. It's nice to see them experiment with their tech a bit more.

Essentially not a lack of ambition, but neither is it the lack of ambition of any other dev that fails to make the golden standard Nintendo has set. They just both merely fail at doing so.

I think we might be talking about slightly different things. I'm talking about in-game tech relative to overall performance profile (image quality + frame-rate), which is where Nintendo tend to be fairly conservative. Hitting perfect locks is almost impossible without a degree of technical conservatism after all (you have to 'waste' a lot of resources to guarantee it never falls below your target no matter the scene complexity). Looking at your other comments i think you were referring purely to 60fps?



AngryLittleAlchemist on 26 October 2017
Goodnightmoon said:
ThisGuyFooks said:

Ive never seen you discuss anything on this site with a calm attitude when someone doesnt agree with your opinion dude.

Chill, this board is made to have fun and interact with others in a peaceful manner.

IMO You should drop the "Whoever is not with me, is against me" attitude, he is not saying that the game sucks, just pointing out something that Digital Foundry said, which is the point of this thread.

He is being negative for the sake of being negative, I hate when people does that, you can keep your advises for you btw, I'll be chill when I want to be chill.

*has a Xenoblade X avatar*

*gets pounced on by Nintendo fanboy*



Goodnightmoon on 26 October 2017
AngryLittleAlchemist said:
Goodnightmoon said:

He is being negative for the sake of being negative, I hate when people does that, you can keep your advises for you btw, I'll be chill when I want to be chill.

*has a Xenoblade X avatar*

*gets pounced on by Nintendo fanboy*

First of all, you shouldn't be calling anyone fanboy, is against the rules.

Second, I can see his avatar, this has nothing to do with our company of preference is just ridiculous to be saying "WOW this is below Nintendo standarts" Because the game has some rare and completely minor dips, is just negativity for the sake of negativity, the game has better performance than the vast majority of games released nowadays, it falls like 3 frames in rare ocasions for fuck sake, who can be seriously complaining about that?

Last edited by Goodnightmoon - on 26 October 2017