By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Zelda: BotW in 4k

vivster said:
caffeinade said:

Is it?

I don't really care about Lady Drake as a character.
Link is both a hotter guy and a more attractive female.

Like Breath of the Wild itself Link is almost perfect design wise.

I heard in Horizon the game doesn't randomly decide that you cannot progress anymore. I couldn't care less about characters or story in an open world game. It's all about fun gameplay and exploration. I haven't played Horizon yet but it's not really hard to top BOTW in open world gameplay.

Play Nier: Automata, it will help you get a better understanding of why BotW is near perfect.



Around the Network

Botw really doesn't look good in 4k



caffeinade said:
vivster said:

I heard in Horizon the game doesn't randomly decide that you cannot progress anymore. I couldn't care less about characters or story in an open world game. It's all about fun gameplay and exploration. I haven't played Horizon yet but it's not really hard to top BOTW in open world gameplay.

Play Nier: Automata, it will help you get a better understanding of why BotW is near perfect.

Fucking Assassin's Creed is a better open world game than BOTW so I'd say BOTW is pretty far away from being perfect.

I can't play Nier because it's shit on PC and I refuse to use community fixes for it.



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.

gcwy said:

Looks much better than the aliased mess that is the Switch version. Texture filtering also makes everything look better. But Switch does have the edge in things like draw distance, which can't be improved in Cemu. I think the Switch version running at 4K would be the best one.

As an aside, Cemu is not 'clockspeed bound', it does, however, benefit greatly from high single core performance, which a higher clock speed can improve. This is why Intel fares much better in emulators because of their high single core performance.

vivster said:
One great thing about low resolutions is that you can easily hide terrible textures.

Low resolutions 'hiding' textures is a ridiculous argument. If anything, the texture filtering that comes at higher resolutions only improves the overall image quality. Every single game looks better at higher resolutions.

Yeah I heard Cemu is mostly 2-3 core's used, and most of that is on just 1 core.

Which apparently isnt all that uncommon with emulators.

 

Something like a i3-8350k is probably the "perfect" cpu, for emulation.

4 cores, at a base clock of 4ghz, and you can overclock it to around 4.8 ghz - 5.1k ghz (depending on luck of the draw).



JRPGfan said:
gcwy said:

Looks much better than the aliased mess that is the Switch version. Texture filtering also makes everything look better. But Switch does have the edge in things like draw distance, which can't be improved in Cemu. I think the Switch version running at 4K would be the best one.

As an aside, Cemu is not 'clockspeed bound', it does, however, benefit greatly from high single core performance, which a higher clock speed can improve. This is why Intel fares much better in emulators because of their high single core performance.

Low resolutions 'hiding' textures is a ridiculous argument. If anything, the texture filtering that comes at higher resolutions only improves the overall image quality. Every single game looks better at higher resolutions.

Yeah I heard Cemu is mostly 2-3 core's used, and most of that is on just 1 core.

Which apparently isnt all that uncommon with emulators.

 

Something like a i3-8350k is probably the "perfect" cpu, for emulation.

4 cores, at a base clock of 4ghz, and you can overclock it to around 4.8 ghz - 5.1k ghz (depending on luck of the draw).

The worst part is, I have a decent 5GHz CPU.
It is just in a case that is too small for my graphics card.



Around the Network

The way it's meant to be played.



4k is dead, 8k is here:
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=232119



Thank god we don't need high pixel count for a game to be good =p



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Higher pixel count doesn't make this game look better. It looked better than those sceenshots on my projector, yet screenshots never really looked great with BotW. Plus what's the fun of playing in Cemu if you don't have moody left joy con connection issues to overcome.

However BotW in VR!!!

Yeah nevermind, it's just on a giant curved virtual screen, VR lol.



Nice. I might consider getting BOTW on WiiU too to try that out. Does it work with the DLC?



3DS-FC: 4511-1768-7903 (Mii-Name: Mnementh), Nintendo-Network-ID: Mnementh, Switch: SW-7706-3819-9381 (Mnementh)

my greatest games: 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024

10 years greatest game event!

bets: [peak year] [+], [1], [2], [3], [4]