Which were those good reasons?! Was it oil or indeed 'weapons of mass destruction'?!

Or are you still trying to justify killing dozens of thousands of Afghan and Iraqi Civilians because of the hunt for essentially one man?!

You mean the false report of illegal weapons which where never found when developing MIRVs to destroy entire continents. The last time the US had a good reason to go to war was with Japan and Germany.

I should have specified what I meant with that. I wasn't really talking about the education part of your comment but rather you posting in political threads.

Funny thing is that you can see in this and other threads that they put Venezuela and NK threats as justifiable and Trump to be acting crazy.

When the president say he will defend his people at the cost of obliterating an enemy you fret because.... ow yes, you should just let NK attack you while you let they blackmail your country on threats.

People should be threated the same for when they do the same acts. I'm greatly tired of seeing appologetical excuses to say movement A doing something is acceptabel (they are fighting the power) and movement B are the menace (they are oppresing).

So in here we have someone making threats and lauching test missiles over someone country and owwww he is just a madman that we have to please so he doesn't nuke others, and on the other side he have someone saying he will retaliate if needed but he is the pure evil.

Haven't seem any crazyness in say he will obliterate his enemy if they attack and that China (without saying the name) have for too long helped NK to pursue its crazyness.

Except USA forced Pearl Harbour by both pressuring Japan to have no alternative and also having intel of the occurence and doing nothing to prevent. Because they wanted to enter war.

Kim Jung Un is a good leader and loves his people. He is misunderstood by the media. There will be no war with North Korea. It is all talk and no action.

If this retard didn't try to trigger that fat Korean kid whole the time, the situation wouldn't be nearly as problematic.

War between the countries is well beyond that point. China has no leverage in that scenario, and China depends on U.S consumers. The moment China compromises its economic security is the moment the Chinese become unsatisfied and call for political change. They're not going to put their necks out for North Korea. 

china has the biggest gold reserves in the world, fort knox is a joke compared to the gold China has been amassing. If china dumps their US treasures/dollars, US will be hit by tremendous inflation.

both are in bed with each other, chine depends on US as much as US depend on China. But once china moves on their plan to replace the petrodollar for the oil they need to buy. They will be in a less US depence level.