TheBigFatJ said:
I'm not arguing, I'm simply stating the fact that it is misleading. They're comparing such a tiny section of the market and therefore it is going to be very favorable to BD, which doesn't have the breadth of DVD. That's my only contingency, and my contingency is correct. There's nothing wrong with Nielson -- they even state that they're only comparing the top 20. It's up to the reader to realize what that means, and I'm only pointing this out so that all of the readers have an extra chance to notice it. Look at the releases for DVD. Nothing. No good new releases, nothing that will get a lot of sales. So while DVD owners are buying outside of the new releases list, and BD owners are as well, BD owners are more likely to be buying the same 20 DVDs because they have many, many fewer to choose from. Before you get excited about that 8%, realize that it is an incomplete and temporary number. We don't even know what movies are in the top 20 for each. |
You've hit the nail on the head.
Comparing selective titles is an exercise in futility. It heavily skews to favour the new format.
Most people can and do realise that the tracking at the moment reveals very little about long term trends.
Blu Ray isnt viable until the price becomes competitive. Here in England a Blu Ray Disc is double the cost of the SD Disc.
Blu Ray might well be the best bit of tech with the worst possible timing.
Imagine trying to grow a luxury product during the biggest worldwide recession since the 30's