By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales - Time To Put The PS2 DVD Myth To Rest

 

 

thismeintiel said:


Labels this the "budget model," yet the poster actually writes that he could have gone cheaper with the 330D model.
Yes, slightly cheaper, the only difference being DD/DTS sound support, a feature the PS2 has.

This actually looks like a mid-range model.  However, the bigger point is, $599 AUD for this.  And the price of the PS2 in AU at launch...$749 AUD.  Ouch.
IT was a player being sold in a huge sale, $599 AUD was *AFTER* a $200 sales deduction, normal price would have been $799.99, converted to USD even after the $200 discount, it was still $365 USD on sale, and  $487 USD prior. also See footnote 1

This price is also in AUD, which means it's actually an even better price than the PS2.
Exchange rate at the time made the $499 USD player,  $304 USD. 
also See footnote 1

According to the manuals copyright, this actually came out in 1999.  It also looks like a mid-range unit.
Copyrights in manuals are based on the September 1999 launch in Japan, no english reviews of the player exist prior to early 2000, so it's safe to say the player did not release in the US/AU/EU until early 2000. also review is here: http://www.michaeldvd.com/HardwareReviews/Pioneer525/Pioneer525.asp explicitly states entry level unit, exchange rate makes the $699 pricetag on the review site $426 USD, $1 over the RRP on Panasonics site, result = entry level dvd player of a decent brand, $126 over the price of a PS2 at launch in the US.

Not sure why we are even looking at premium models.  But, again, it's AUD and the reviewer even says it is a poor value for the money.
For perspective, if you're going to look at the cheapest off-brand products and their black friday bargain basement prices to try and prove a point, it stands to reason that looking at premium players of the time for perspective makes sense, and a $1579 dvd player ticks that box nicely.

AUD.  PS2 $749 AUD.  
Budget off-brand player, $499 AUD, which was, as of 2000, still $304, the price of a PS2 stateside.

Again, why premium?
For perspective, again, and to show the varying priceranges for such products of the era.
$915 USD.

AUD.  PS2 $749 AUD.  Nuff said.
PS2: $300 USD, this player after date-appropriate currency conversion: $365

This one is closer to the PS2, but still not quite there.  And there are cheaper models.
$426 USD after conversion, PS2 launched in US at $300

Again, much cheaper models available.
Still a $609 USD "Budget" dvd player released the same year as the PS2.

Ditto.
Still a $548 USD
 "Budget" dvd player released the same year as the PS2.

And now, for the best.  Labeled this as a budget model.  Actual review says "deluxe model in the Lenoxx DVD player range, supplementing the budget-priced and lowly-rated DVD-725B."  The actual price of the budget model?  $399 AUD.  $350 less than the PS2.
It's the "Deluxe" model of a budget brand, and as the review also states, "Agressively priced at $499, and just like its cheaper version, a "sub standard performer", with such a glowing review as "The Lenoxx DVD-9000 is a DVD player that is significantly hampered by a poor quality image, one which is amongst the worst I have seen on any DVD player".

While it may be advertised as "deluxe", it's a shitty no-name brand and a poor, terribly manufactured POS that even when aggressively priced at $499 AUD, after currency conversion it's still $4 more expensive than a PS2.

thismeintiel said:

Now, you're just making things up.  GE, Samsung, and even Sony, had cheaper players available, as in $149-$199.  They were even cheaper on Black Friday.  They are far from shitty brands.  The only no name brand player I linked was $18 in 2004.  But, even the good brands had ones less than $50 the year prior. 

Soooo... you're saying AEP, Grundig, Palsonic, Orion and Lenoxx aren't shitty brands? and even if we use only the links you provided in the OP.. those cheap players they were looking at, what brands were they exactly?...  Apex, GE, Zenith, and then a cheap low end Samsung which still cost more than the price of a PS2 outsode of the US anyway..

Footnotes:

1) Australian market is a captive one so products without immediate nationally available competition, end up subject to large markups, consoles have historically had a large markup in Australia on account of there never really being more than three manufacturers at any given time, where as the DVD market at the time was awash with players from a wide range of brands each with a wide range of models, and price reductions were rife to compete on the market, thus doesnt happen with consoles in Australia and never has, which is why Australian gamers specifically, get shafted.

2) Even if you factor in the above and apply it specifically to DVD players as if they suffered the same sort of markups, the USD, US launch price of PS2 was $299, the USD, AU launch price of PS2 was $456, a markup of $157 or roughly 32%, even if you take that metric and remove the markup from the player prices listed in USD converted, the result is still the same, none of the players would be under $200.

3) In some regions DVD player usage was still so much in it's infancy that only specialist stores carried them, take for example the UK, it's biggest and most popular catalog store, Argos, back in the late 90s, early 2000s was the primary method which most people in the UK would buy products, and yet in the spring/summer 1999 catalog, dvd players weren't even listed for sale. - Yet within 9 months customers in the UK could buy the PS2 with dvd playback.

Your entire premise for the thread is that the feature wasn't a big deal and that it wasn't a big selling point for the console, because at the time no-name budget brands, in heavilly discounted sales, were cheaper, that's a rediculously stupid argument, for a start, it would depend on waiting for such sales, availability etc, just to pay half the price of a Ps2 for some dodgy chinese off-brand unit, show me a good brand dvd player for under $250 in early 2000, that was a general in store retail price, go ahead, just try.

That's before you even venture into the "dual purpose, dual recipient" side of things, think of how many parents thought to themselves, "we can buy our son/daughter a games console AND a cheap dvd player, at the same time?, for much less than the $600-$2000 we spent on our livingrooms dvd player only a couple years ago?" - At the time dvd prices were still on the way down due to heavy stuffing from shitty brands pushing crap into the market to capitolize, often with terrible image quality or composite video out, making the image quality even worse.

Then suddenly, PS2, that supports not only DVD but component output, DTS sound, SPDIF and on top of all that, plays the latest and greatest games?

Whether you like it or not, DVD was a big deal for the PS2 launch, the fact that even the article you based this thread on mentions people specifically waiting for the PS2 to release, to use as a DVD player only further demonstrates that.

And in the end, your unwillingness to talk about standalone DVD players at anything other than their discounted/cheapest-brand prices, while at the same time being unwilling to talk about the PS2 by anything other than it's launch price, shows a heavy bias, hell you even go as far as mentioning a $18 dvd player black friday ad, for something released 4 years after the PS2, and what amazing brand unit was that?, Norcent.. who I'm sure everyone here has heard of and knows for their quality, reliable products..



Around the Network

Well PS2 was in the era of selling consoles at a big loss. So the power PS2 had with a DVD player was pretty exceptional in 2000 and several years after.

I think UHD will be standard in the 9th gen given its cheap tech now.



Recently Completed
River City: Rival Showdown
for 3DS (3/5) - River City: Tokyo Rumble for 3DS (4/5) - Zelda: BotW for Wii U (5/5) - Zelda: BotW for Switch (5/5) - Zelda: Link's Awakening for Switch (4/5) - Rage 2 for X1X (4/5) - Rage for 360 (3/5) - Streets of Rage 4 for X1/PC (4/5) - Gears 5 for X1X (5/5) - Mortal Kombat 11 for X1X (5/5) - Doom 64 for N64 (emulator) (3/5) - Crackdown 3 for X1S/X1X (4/5) - Infinity Blade III - for iPad 4 (3/5) - Infinity Blade II - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Infinity Blade - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Wolfenstein: The Old Blood for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Origins for X1 (3/5) - Uncharted: Lost Legacy for PS4 (4/5) - EA UFC 3 for X1 (4/5) - Doom for X1 (4/5) - Titanfall 2 for X1 (4/5) - Super Mario 3D World for Wii U (4/5) - South Park: The Stick of Truth for X1 BC (4/5) - Call of Duty: WWII for X1 (4/5) -Wolfenstein II for X1 - (4/5) - Dead or Alive: Dimensions for 3DS (4/5) - Marvel vs Capcom: Infinite for X1 (3/5) - Halo Wars 2 for X1/PC (4/5) - Halo Wars: DE for X1 (4/5) - Tekken 7 for X1 (4/5) - Injustice 2 for X1 (4/5) - Yakuza 5 for PS3 (3/5) - Battlefield 1 (Campaign) for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Syndicate for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: MW Remastered for X1 (4/5) - Donkey Kong Country Returns for 3DS (4/5) - Forza Horizon 3 for X1 (5/5)

lol @ PS2 having one of the best launch lineups ever.
lol @ thinking that you can speak for the buying habits of over 100,000,000 people.
lol @ caring about this like 17 years after PS2 launched. Does it bother you that much?

I knew more than a few people who bought the PS2 largely because it was a DVD player. There's nothing really wrong with that. Why does that idea bother you? It doesn't take away any sales, they still count.



I'd argue the shitty drive in the PS2 was the cause of it selling so much. There were many rebuys because of the laser/drive failures.



Well, you can keep trying to "put the myth to rest" as much as you like. But it is not gonna work.



Around the Network
NATO said:

 

 

thismeintiel said:


Labels this the "budget model," yet the poster actually writes that he could have gone cheaper with the 330D model.
Yes, slightly cheaper, the only difference being DD/DTS sound support, a feature the PS2 has.

This actually looks like a mid-range model.  However, the bigger point is, $599 AUD for this.  And the price of the PS2 in AU at launch...$749 AUD.  Ouch.
IT was a player being sold in a huge sale, $599 AUD was *AFTER* a $200 sales deduction, normal price would have been $799.99, converted to USD even after the $200 discount, it was still $365 USD on sale, and  $487 USD prior. also See footnote 1

This price is also in AUD, which means it's actually an even better price than the PS2.
Exchange rate at the time made the $499 USD player,  $304 USD. 
also See footnote 1

According to the manuals copyright, this actually came out in 1999.  It also looks like a mid-range unit.
Copyrights in manuals are based on the September 1999 launch in Japan, no english reviews of the player exist prior to early 2000, so it's safe to say the player did not release in the US/AU/EU until early 2000. also review is here: http://www.michaeldvd.com/HardwareReviews/Pioneer525/Pioneer525.asp explicitly states entry level unit, exchange rate makes the $699 pricetag on the review site $426 USD, $1 over the RRP on Panasonics site, result = entry level dvd player of a decent brand, $126 over the price of a PS2 at launch in the US.

Not sure why we are even looking at premium models.  But, again, it's AUD and the reviewer even says it is a poor value for the money.
For perspective, if you're going to look at the cheapest off-brand products and their black friday bargain basement prices to try and prove a point, it stands to reason that looking at premium players of the time for perspective makes sense, and a $1579 dvd player ticks that box nicely.

AUD.  PS2 $749 AUD.  
Budget off-brand player, $499 AUD, which was, as of 2000, still $304, the price of a PS2 stateside.

Again, why premium?
For perspective, again, and to show the varying priceranges for such products of the era.
$915 USD.

AUD.  PS2 $749 AUD.  Nuff said.
PS2: $300 USD, this player after date-appropriate currency conversion: $365

This one is closer to the PS2, but still not quite there.  And there are cheaper models.
$426 USD after conversion, PS2 launched in US at $300

Again, much cheaper models available.
Still a $609 USD "Budget" dvd player released the same year as the PS2.

Ditto.
Still a $548 USD
 "Budget" dvd player released the same year as the PS2.

And now, for the best.  Labeled this as a budget model.  Actual review says "deluxe model in the Lenoxx DVD player range, supplementing the budget-priced and lowly-rated DVD-725B."  The actual price of the budget model?  $399 AUD.  $350 less than the PS2.
It's the "Deluxe" model of a budget brand, and as the review also states, "Agressively priced at $499, and just like its cheaper version, a "sub standard performer", with such a glowing review as "The Lenoxx DVD-9000 is a DVD player that is significantly hampered by a poor quality image, one which is amongst the worst I have seen on any DVD player".

While it may be advertised as "deluxe", it's a shitty no-name brand and a poor, terribly manufactured POS that even when aggressively priced at $499 AUD, after currency conversion it's still $4 more expensive than a PS2.

thismeintiel said:

Now, you're just making things up.  GE, Samsung, and even Sony, had cheaper players available, as in $149-$199.  They were even cheaper on Black Friday.  They are far from shitty brands.  The only no name brand player I linked was $18 in 2004.  But, even the good brands had ones less than $50 the year prior. 

Your whole point is refuted by pointing out that most of those prices were AUD, something you chose to not to point out.  Hmm, wonder why.  And as the $749 price of the launch PS2 in AUS proves, you CAN'T just do a straight conversion of AUD to USD to win your argument. You have to do apples to apples, you know.

LudicrousSpeed said:
lol @ PS2 having one of the best launch lineups ever.
lol @ thinking that you can speak for the buying habits of over 100,000,000 people.
lol @ caring about this like 17 years after PS2 launched. Does it bother you that much?

I knew more than a few people who bought the PS2 largely because it was a DVD player. There's nothing really wrong with that. Why does that idea bother you? It doesn't take away any sales, they still count.

Does my data (price points, Xbox w/ DVD failure, SW attach rate) disproving this myth bother you so much you have to enter this thread and offer nothing constructive to it?  If so, just move on with your lols.  Thanks.



thismeintiel said:

Your whole point is refuted by pointing out that most of those prices were AUD, something you chose to not to point out.  Hmm, wonder why.  

Every single link was provided, every single AU price listed was taken directly from the page linked, and every single page linked states it's australian, I even go as far as stating the AU to US exchange rate for the time frame involved so you could go in to the reviews and do the math yourself, is expecting you to actually click the links now some sort of deception?

Are you genuinely arguing that expecting any level of effort on your part is deceptive? oh man.

thismeintiel said:

And as the $749 price of the launch PS2 in AUS proves, you CAN'T just do a straight conversion of AUD to USD to win your argument. You have to do apples to apples, you know.

Yes this was already addressed since I figured you would pull this bullshit argument too.

NATO said:

1) Australian market is a captive one so products without immediate nationally available competition, end up subject to large markups, consoles have historically had a large markup in Australia on account of there never really being more than three manufacturers at any given time, where as the DVD market at the time was awash with players from a wide range of brands each with a wide range of models, and price reductions were rife to compete on the market, thus doesnt happen with consoles in Australia and never has, which is why Australian gamers specifically, get shafted.

2) Even if you factor in the above and apply it specifically to DVD players as if they suffered the same sort of markups, the USD, US launch price of PS2 was $299, the USD, AU launch price of PS2 was $456, a markup of $157 or roughly 32%, even if you take that metric and remove the markup from the player prices listed in USD converted, the result is still the same, none of the players would be under $200.

As stated, even if DVD players were held to the same markups as games consoles (They are not, dvd player market had significantly greater competition thus marking up player prices would not work anywhere near as effectively as it did for consoles), they would still end up in the same ballpark as the PS2.

And then we have the EU/UK pricing and availability, which puts the PS2 firmly in the crosshairs of being in the same pricerange as low end dvd players in those regions, at launch.

As for all the other points brought up that you skipped, to coin your style of posting, "Hmm, wonder why.  ".



It was probably bullshit but, in a 2001 interview in EGM (I think it was the green issue with Xbox on the cover) Microsoft claimed that the reason the Xbox didn't have DVD playback at launch was because they "Didn't want to keep the console out of the hands of a gamer" elaborating that one of the reasons the PS2 was scarce was because movie lovers were buying it.

Don't get me wrong. I'm sure the vast majority bought a PS2 for the amazing library that began from Holiday 2001 until the end of its life. The Gamecube/Xbox library couldn't even begin to compare. For that first year though, it was rough! Rather than buy a PS2 for its games, we bought one for the promise of games to come.

I think EGM said (During the launch of Dead or Alive 2) "One month after the PS2 launch and we're already back on our Dreamcasts". And when it came to the launch day "Make no mistake about it. On the day of the PS2 launch, there will be no finer game than Majora's Mask".

DVD wasn't there sole reason for PS2's success. It was just another feature in a long list of things the PS2 was doing right. Another magazine that I can't remember said "They're getting this launch so right, it isn't funny". We all know how it turned out. Not sure why the OP feels the need to defend the most successful console of all time.



thismeintiel said:
konnichiwa said:

No DVD was very important for PS2 success.

Japan went heavy crazy for PS2 one of the biggest reasons was DVD like you can see here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t4SJKcWbmAI

The PS2 almost shipped 10 million in its first two years in Japan (Took PS3 + 8 years and possible same or a little better for PS4).  With that kind of install base it had devs jumping on it to make games and others to even make promised exclusive games for another system go multiplatform.

the DVD for PS2 is basically the FFVII for PS one in Japan they had same huge effect.

This actually proves my point.  DVD had been out in Japan for 3 years before the PS2's launch.  It hadn't really caught on, just like the video says.  But, when gamers bought a PS2, which was more expensive than DVD players, those gamers decided to give DVD a try.  They eventually started to switch over.  This proves that DVD didn't help the PS2.  The PS2 helped DVD.  If it was the other way around, those DVD stores would have already been up and popular.  And the PS2 would have just made them even more popular. 

The Dreamcast having DVD wouldn't really have helped it, either.  In the end, it would have been the same console.  People were just hyped by the follow up to the highly successful PS1.  And Sony delivered on that hype.

Your point about the PS3 and PS4 really makes no sense.  That has much more to do with the home console market in Japan becoming smaller as gamers switched to HHs and mobile gaming.  Even the popular Wii only pulled off 12.8M there, while PS2 did 23.2M and the PS1 did 19.4M (without DVD.)

Really?



The buying explosion began on March 4, when Sony unleashed PlayStation 2. As many as 40% to 50% of the system's buyers admitted that they bought the system for both games and DVDs, while some admit that they simply bought it for DVDs.

 

+

One of the most popular DVD titles is The Matrix. Time Warner Entertainment shipped 600,000 units of the movie in the first two weeks following the PS2 launch, and now target sales for the year are projected at 1.5 million pieces. 

http://www.ign.com/articles/2000/04/13/ps2-pushes-dvd-in-japan



the Wii only pulled 12 million because it had a short lifespan and their was also PS3 with 10 million sales.  Sony expected the PS3 would be an item for blu Ray fans like PS2 with DVD. 






thismeintiel said:
Dulfite said:
I've never heard of this. I have heard of a lot of people buying P3 because it was cheaper than a blue ray player when it launched.

See, this at least makes sense.  When the PS3 launched, it actually was among the cheapest Bluray players out there.  You couldn't find a Bluray player for half the price of the PS3, like you could do for a DVD player when the PS2 launched.  Of course, that also didn't last long and Bluray players dropped pretty quickly.  The attach rate being almost exactly the same as the 360 also proves that while it did happen, it was the extreme minority who bought it just for Bluray.

konnichiwa said:

ugh, I think you are starting to lose people now. The headstart of the Genesis certainly helped it, it even became the most selling console in Europe. Big gains compared to what the Master System did. That's why they always tried to release their console first. Saturn did a good fight the first year but it has to many issues. Dreamcast headstart kept it atleast alive for some time, if it released with PS2 around the same time it would have game over in months. Kind of amazed that you say the x360 headstart did not help its sales, it certainly did had an efffect especially if you compare it with the xbox that had not a headstart.

No comment about the first part?  Ok.

Did I say it didn't help it?  No.  I said it didn't help it beat X console.  And it didn't.  The headstart really means little in the long run.  Just look at the 3DO, Jaguar, Saturn, Dreamcast, and Wii U for prime examples.

You get a few extra million in sales, maybe, but it's what you do after that that determines where you end up.  If you don't have a competitive price, appealing HW, great 1st party support, and great 3rd party support, you won't get very far.  It's how a newcomer to the industry took down 2 giants of that industry.

I did not comment about the first part because PS2 was 199-250 Euro (depends on currencty) when Xbox launched for 450 euro .

And you said it makes no difference to have a headstart, It helped the megadrive to beat the Snes in Europe, it helped the PS1 to get devs make games for its system because of its userbase and don't bother with N64, it helped Xbox 360 thanks to its existing install base to get more games and make it win in the USA.