Highest ( imperceptible ) performance.

More less library.

Highest price.

Thats not how checkerboard works though.

take your pic, and then make all the "white" boxes be the rendered image of the new frame, and then all the black bozes are "made up/reconstructed" images using sameples from the neighbouring pixels (which are taken from the rendered pixels). There is a lot more to this though, but this is the best summary I could give.

That is where enter the 3 point, cost.

But sure since it isn't performance itself nothing is holding Nintendo to change to a better display and battery when the price is lower and they do a revision.

I am hoping for a revision, that's likely when I will pick one up. I would prefer at-least an 8" screen. 7" would be passable. But it needs to be 1080P... And hopefully all games run in the "Docked Mode" on it.

I think Microsoft have dug a hole for themselves by claiming it as a true 4K console. 60fps is gone out of window as well which was already known and they have admitted it as well. Personally I think they just had to better PS4P little bit with the same price. Say like 12gig of ram with more bandwidth and slightly more clocked cpu/gpu than PS4P and sell it for 400$. I think that would be enough to get them back. The X is going fail hard. They really need some good games to showcase it power. Forza7 a racing sim I am not sure. GTS looks awesome TBH

I just gave up on it.

If the game is fun AND gorgeous, that's just a bonus. Higher resolution doesn't necessarily mean a game looks better anyway.

I don't use HH too much, but if I was choosing I would preffer bigger, beffier and with more battery for a good price.