Nope it isn't exclusive...
It can only be counted when and not even quite 1:1 on cases of platform vs platform.
X1 vs PS4 available game, then you list what can be played in one that can't in the other. Same for X1 vs Switch or PS4 vs Switch.
But that aint 1:1 because in case of X1 about 100% of the games can be played on PC and so they having no real exclusives make the list versus PS4 either using true exclusives or silly definitions see weak.
And in the case of a PS4 vs Switch it gets bad for switch because the multiplats aren't majorily there.
But since I play mostly 1st party with some 2nd part or older franchises that were born in the 90s the MPs are just bonus for me. If I preferred the Nintendo games I would be a Switch owner instead of a PS4 owner, but I do prefer Sony 1st parties.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."