If someone thinks Horizon is a better game then that's totally fine

I only answered a question, with the most accurate answer.

Tell me yours.

ANd....

As a gamer why should i care about the money of this companies??

Didnt know you got the exact amount of income and the revenue generated for those horizon copies.

I hope you that in your Math you have calculated all the fortune  Sony expended  in marketing.

I bet you BOTW generates more REVENUE for copy. If money is what you care about.

Zelda is already outpacing horizon according to vgchartz. As suspected, horizon was front loaded and Zelda would have better legs. 

But what truth are you telling?  How did you come to the conclusion that Horizon failed at surpassing Zelda in TRANSCENDENCY? How did you come to the conclusion that no one cared about the graphics? The only truth so far is that Zelda had the better META. Sales are still up in the air even though I think that Zelda will sell the best out of the two.

Can't say that Horizon was front loaded just yet. We don't know the numbers just yet so the "legs" on both are still questionable. Although I personally  think Zelda will sell more.

How is that? Again it seems Zelda fans are the ones a bit upset.

After playing both games, I have to say that in my opinion, Horizon is a much better game in everything but graphics. The procedurally generated graphics of Horizon look generic, even in 4K. Zelda sometimes looks foggy and ugly but is crafted with much more love, care and attention to detail.

I am a huge Zelda fan but I do not like BotW that much, mainly because it lacks story, music, heart pieces and item / dungeon diversity and I absolutely hate the bad usability of the menu and cooking system.

Horizon really surprised me, it has a real story on the AAA level of Xenoblade Chronicles. I will remember playing Horizon forever, but I won't remember a single moment of my boring 100+ hours with Zelda.

Fair enough.

Yep, very safe. If GAF made a bingo card for open world "RPG" games and included every trope and cliche element of modern design for the genre, it would have hit them all. There's nothing wrong with just making a good, solid, safe game. But the fact that it does absolutely nothing new or of its own is a testament to how safe Sony played it. Not all new IPs are a risk. Destiny was guaranteed to be a success before it even launched. Same with Overwatch. Horizon isn't the typical new IP. 

And you can play revisionist history if you'd like, but GG has been one of the most popular Sony devs since the PS2 era. They had heir breakout game last gen, Killzone 2. It not only outscored Horizon in critical acclaim but was also unique and had GGs own personality. Horizon has neither of those. Adding to the evidence of how popular they are, KZ2 was one of the games Sony used to show off the PS3, and IIRC Killzone was also the first PS4 game shown. You're rattling off numbers about how they are top 10 first/second party, you're only making my point for me. I didn't say they are THE most popular Sony developer. I said a very popular Sony dev, which they are, by your own numbers you just posted.

The only risk involved with Horizon was giving GG a game that would require a lot of story and writing, because they've proven to be shit at both. But Sony erased that risk by signing people form other companies who can write a good narrative. It had a huge marketing machine behind it on a huge user base, of course it was going to succeed. And I don't want to make it sound like I am pooing on the game, as I said before, it's good.

"How is that?" By data and evidence. Tell me how I seem upset by stating facts? Zelda is legging better for sure, according to the data we have. Keep in mind that this is with supply constraints on the Switch, as well. That doesn't change the fact that Horizon has sold extremely well, but it's sales have nothing to do with Zelda and Zelda is currently selling better in the long run anyway (according to observable data so far)

I think you're simply biased to your fanbase and like to think Zelda fans are especially upset about something. I'm sure some of them are, but Horizon fans aren't? Yeah right lol

But what truth are you telling?  How did you come to the conclusion that Horizon failed at surpassing Zelda in TRANSCENDENCY? How did you come to the conclusion that no one cared about the graphics? The only truth so far is that Zelda had the better META. Sales are still up in the air even though I think that Zelda will sell the best out of the two.

The truth is: 

Zelda kicked Horizon´s ass.

Transcendency???

RDR2  Better have a climb system or it will feel old with all those non interactive mountains. And a modern horse mechanics.

GTA6 Better have a new quest system, because freedom is the new black.

Horizon 2 Better have a robust pysichs engine and enviroment interactivity or there will be another 89 game (or less).

And about graphics,please tell me,,,,

How many threads all over the Internet we have about Horizon vs Zelda graphics???

Finally, about sales: sales dont tell us a shit about quality, COD, AC, even that crazy sales of GTAV are beyond reasoning because let´s be honest: is not that good.