By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics - US Has Allegedly Killed 1400+ Civilians In the Past Month

LurkerJ said:
kopstudent89 said:

Our sense? I'm not from the US. I'm middleeastern. I've lived through some of the bullshit. I've watched news channels like the CNN twist facts about the region. I've seen the tactics some Western countries and their allies use against people in my region.

BTW we fucking hate ISIS and I'm saying that the majority would gladly give our lives to stop them. That said it's ironic that the Syrian government is against ISIS yet Saudi is the biggest exporter of ISIS. Where is the US exactly fighting ISIS? Some places yes other places they're labelled as the rebels. Depends where it suits to brand them however they want.

Saudi grand mufti calls for demolition of churches

http://www.timesofisrael.com/saudi-grand-mufti-calls-for-demolition-of-churches/

According to wikipedia: The Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia is the most senior and most influential Muslim religious and legal authority in Saudi Arabia. The holder of the position is appointed by the King. 

Pretty ISISy if you ask me.

Isn't that agreeing with what he said?



Around the Network
Aura7541 said:
Goatseye said:

Let me put it this way for you.

   United States WANTED radicalized islamization in the Middle East. It financed it and used it, to oust national sentiments in the locals where they had businesses interests. Middle East after breaking from Ottoman Empire was in the process of democratization and nationalization of their land and natural resources. That process would've gotten in the way of imperial aspirations of colonial Europe and US prominence in world stage.

   Radical Islamization of once moderate religious countries in the ME, is a tactic used by America throughout the world to supress local populace where business booms and threat of cutting ties with the West is real. This was not the only tactic used to achieve their goals though; puppet and bloodlust authoritarian governments were sponsored and forcefully placed in continents such as Africa, where democracy for many countries was an achievable feat and necessary for protection of their common good. Most great thinkers and democracy fathers in Africa were killed off by European colonialists and CIA backed ops. It was a way for them to undermine their hope of sovereignty and appropriate of their riches.

If that doesn't sound malicious to you, then your moral compass is much more flexible than most of us.

Your response is rather similar to your previous one, so I'm just going reply one last time. Using radical Islam as a means doesn't necessarily prove the want of it. Like I said, it's somewhere in the middle because you can't just point your finger at the US collectively. It's not a black-and-white situation like the way you're making it up to be. The US has a history of opting for political expediency over thinking long-term and its involvement in the Middle East is no exception. To simplify the US's thinking process, it's along the lines of "I don't like A, so I'm going to have B take down A even though B is bad". The US has applied this mentality for years and has not learned to stop and think about the long term consequences.

I agree with you that what the US has done is really bad, but it's not advisable to conflate actus reus and mens reas willy nilly.

US government wanted Radical Islamization of ME countries until it turned back to bite. It was their biggest tool in taming an area where religious belief trumps secular ideologies. More than want, they needed it.

US government is the highest representation of American people; when the military goes to war, America goes to war and whenever it gets attacked American people gets attacked. It's black and white, no one else represents the American people, whether you like it or not.

 



Aura7541 said:

As I have posted on the other thread, please try to refrain from personal attacks and keep the discussion civil. The mod team has noticed that some posts are a bit too aggressive.

What are your thoughts on the thread title? It's a bit deceptive (as the report says allegedly) and there is contradicting information from other sources.



"We'll toss the dice however they fall,
And snuggle the girls be they short or tall,
Then follow young Mat whenever he calls,
To dance with Jak o' the Shadows."

Check out MyAnimeList and my Game Collection. Owner of the 5 millionth post.

outlawauron said:
Aura7541 said:

As I have posted on the other thread, please try to refrain from personal attacks and keep the discussion civil. The mod team has noticed that some posts are a bit too aggressive.

What are your thoughts on the thread title? It's a bit deceptive (as the report says allegedly) and there is contradicting information from other sources.

I haven't looked at the other sources (I would like to see those too to see the bigger picture). However, looking at the cited article from the OP, it definitely said 'allegedly' along with other qualifiers. I'll edit that in the thread title for accuracy purposes.



LurkerJ said:
Mr Puggsly said:

Nice analogy...

Because getting your dick wet is comprable to what's happening in Syria.

No, it's not. I probably should use more silly analogies though, because you clearly don't get it.

But then again, if you don't get what "actions are louder than words" mean and how it can be applied, I shouldn't bother asking you to read history, I should've realized that the moment you asked us to judge leaders based on their "intents".

Lack of knowledge isn't the only problem here

Yeah, I'm looking at actions and its not the US's fault hundreds of thousands are dead and millions are leaving Syria.



Recently Completed
River City: Rival Showdown
for 3DS (3/5) - River City: Tokyo Rumble for 3DS (4/5) - Zelda: BotW for Wii U (5/5) - Zelda: BotW for Switch (5/5) - Zelda: Link's Awakening for Switch (4/5) - Rage 2 for X1X (4/5) - Rage for 360 (3/5) - Streets of Rage 4 for X1/PC (4/5) - Gears 5 for X1X (5/5) - Mortal Kombat 11 for X1X (5/5) - Doom 64 for N64 (emulator) (3/5) - Crackdown 3 for X1S/X1X (4/5) - Infinity Blade III - for iPad 4 (3/5) - Infinity Blade II - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Infinity Blade - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Wolfenstein: The Old Blood for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Origins for X1 (3/5) - Uncharted: Lost Legacy for PS4 (4/5) - EA UFC 3 for X1 (4/5) - Doom for X1 (4/5) - Titanfall 2 for X1 (4/5) - Super Mario 3D World for Wii U (4/5) - South Park: The Stick of Truth for X1 BC (4/5) - Call of Duty: WWII for X1 (4/5) -Wolfenstein II for X1 - (4/5) - Dead or Alive: Dimensions for 3DS (4/5) - Marvel vs Capcom: Infinite for X1 (3/5) - Halo Wars 2 for X1/PC (4/5) - Halo Wars: DE for X1 (4/5) - Tekken 7 for X1 (4/5) - Injustice 2 for X1 (4/5) - Yakuza 5 for PS3 (3/5) - Battlefield 1 (Campaign) for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Syndicate for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: MW Remastered for X1 (4/5) - Donkey Kong Country Returns for 3DS (4/5) - Forza Horizon 3 for X1 (5/5)

Around the Network
LurkerJ said:
kopstudent89 said:

Our sense? I'm not from the US. I'm middleeastern. I've lived through some of the bullshit. I've watched news channels like the CNN twist facts about the region. I've seen the tactics some Western countries and their allies use against people in my region.

BTW we fucking hate ISIS and I'm saying that the majority would gladly give our lives to stop them. That said it's ironic that the Syrian government is against ISIS yet Saudi is the biggest exporter of ISIS. Where is the US exactly fighting ISIS? Some places yes other places they're labelled as the rebels. Depends where it suits to brand them however they want.

Saudi grand mufti calls for demolition of churches

http://www.timesofisrael.com/saudi-grand-mufti-calls-for-demolition-of-churches/

According to wikipedia: The Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia is the most senior and most influential Muslim religious and legal authority in Saudi Arabia. The holder of the position is appointed by the King. 

Pretty ISISy if you ask me.

Yes that's what I said. They are wahhabis, their history has been founded on religious extremism. It's a damn shame they are allowed to influence the region so much. I'm a bit happy they've wasted half their cash reserve on Yemen adn finally look like they're pulling their hand out of some things but they're still a huge problem



Mr Puggsly said:
LurkerJ said:

No, it's not. I probably should use more silly analogies though, because you clearly don't get it.

But then again, if you don't get what "actions are louder than words" mean and how it can be applied, I shouldn't bother asking you to read history, I should've realized that the moment you asked us to judge leaders based on their "intents".

Lack of knowledge isn't the only problem here

Yeah, I'm looking at actions and its not the US's fault hundreds of thousands are dead and millions are leaving Syria.

Let's say I agree, I don't think we're discussing just Syria here. It's in the first line in the OP. Can't you read?

Once again, you are showing me why asking you to read history was a mistake, you can't even read the first line of the OP.



kopstudent89 said:
LurkerJ said:

Saudi grand mufti calls for demolition of churches

http://www.timesofisrael.com/saudi-grand-mufti-calls-for-demolition-of-churches/

According to wikipedia: The Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia is the most senior and most influential Muslim religious and legal authority in Saudi Arabia. The holder of the position is appointed by the King. 

Pretty ISISy if you ask me.

Yes that's what I said. They are wahhabis, their history has been founded on religious extremism. It's a damn shame they are allowed to influence the region so much. I'm a bit happy they've wasted half their cash reserve on Yemen adn finally look like they're pulling their hand out of some things but they're still a huge problem

I've read been contradicting opinions on the financial stituation of the Gulf states in general. It seems that the economical "troubles" of Saudi Arabia in particular are overblown. I don't know what's the point of making those troubles bigger than they seem, but there's definitely something fishy going on there.



LurkerJ said:
kopstudent89 said:

Yes that's what I said. They are wahhabis, their history has been founded on religious extremism. It's a damn shame they are allowed to influence the region so much. I'm a bit happy they've wasted half their cash reserve on Yemen adn finally look like they're pulling their hand out of some things but they're still a huge problem

I've read been contradicting opinions on the financial stituation of the Gulf states in general. It seems that the economical "troubles" of Saudi Arabia in particular are overblown. I don't know what's the point of making those troubles bigger than they seem, but there's definitely something fishy going on there.

Trust me..  they have big financial problems. I'm not talking about Gulf states just Saudi. They just reverted to a Gregorian calender from the Lunar one for the first time in history to have the yearly paycheck be accounted for 365 days instead of 355. Also business is just bad. Many people from my country work there and it's the worst it's ever been.

They're doing a good job of trying to hide it though and obviously they don't want to make it public so that the people don't turn on them. They still have a lot of cash reserve obviously but over the last 20 years they didn't invest in other industries and remained too dependant on oil, something other Gulf states did a bit better, and then they wasted some $300-400b on recent wars so it's not a good sign.



kopstudent89 said:

Yes that's what I said. They are wahhabis

I don't think that sort of sectarianism solves anything. Anyone who tries to look "moderate" blames the salafis, then the salafis blame the shia or asha'ira (other groups) - it's an endless exercise of finger pointing that gets little done. The Saudi administration is nowhere near "wahhabi" - they are far removed from Islam as a whol, in fact. They do, of course, endorse a certain breed of Salafi (madkhalis) as that suits their agenda but that movement is hardly gaining traction, they are shut down anywhere they appear and not taken seriously at all. The decline of the monarchy is impending but the Muslims you call "wahhabi" will remain so it is important to draw certain distinctions or this blame game, that sometimes leads to bloodshed, will continue.

 

contestgamer said:

You need to be able to create a cultural conversion too, which takes time. You need to turn those countries in to liberal, tolerant free societies and to do that you need to have a massive propoganda plan as well. 

The West has attempted that, they began over 100 years ago in fact, and it worked to some extent but it's being undone in many Muslim lands and communities, as the youth wake up to their rich heritage and culture thankfully.

It is interesting to see the deep-rooted bigotry and racism inherent in some of the responses. For example, that one guy suggesting life wasn't as valuable in that part of the world LOL ok then. I do not say that you are a bad person but rather that you posess some ideals that show exactly how much of a farce the "tolerant, free" Western society is.


I posted this earlier, if you missed it I highly suggest giving it a read: http://www.hizb-australia.org/2017/04/bureaucratising-violence-is-the-world-really-moving-forward/