Aura7541 said:
Your response is rather similar to your previous one, so I'm just going reply one last time. Using radical Islam as a means doesn't necessarily prove the want of it. Like I said, it's somewhere in the middle because you can't just point your finger at the US collectively. It's not a black-and-white situation like the way you're making it up to be. The US has a history of opting for political expediency over thinking long-term and its involvement in the Middle East is no exception. To simplify the US's thinking process, it's along the lines of "I don't like A, so I'm going to have B take down A even though B is bad". The US has applied this mentality for years and has not learned to stop and think about the long term consequences. I agree with you that what the US has done is really bad, but it's not advisable to conflate actus reus and mens reas willy nilly. |
US government wanted Radical Islamization of ME countries until it turned back to bite. It was their biggest tool in taming an area where religious belief trumps secular ideologies. More than want, they needed it.
US government is the highest representation of American people; when the military goes to war, America goes to war and whenever it gets attacked American people gets attacked. It's black and white, no one else represents the American people, whether you like it or not.







