I'm not paying €600-€800 just to play a bunch of SNES-Wii looking games in 720p and with awkward controls. 

http://nintendoeverything.com/latest-switch-tech-details-including-new-mode-that-boosts-mobile-clocks-by-25-percent/

Read it and weep. Also I thought xbone was 1GHz so I said 76%. I was talking about the docked performance. If In handheld mode it could get 76% of xobne that would essentially mean its beyond amazing and could probably outdo PS4 when docked but that's not the case

Hey guess what I checked Xbone and its GPU clock is 853MHz so GPU wise switch is more than 76% of xbone docked but the CPU speed is less closer and also RAM is half but DDR4 instead of DDR3. Considering everything switch is actually not that bad when stacked up against an XBONE don't you think. And I don't know these Flops are calculated but its sure as hell greater than 400GFlops all things considered

Its not that simple and you cant say now whats Switch main competition will be, Switch is launching in middle of PS4/XB1 lifespan and where PS4/XB1 have mid life span upgrades, thats totally different situation compared to previous generations. PS5/XB2 can be launched in 3 years, but also we could have Switch Pro at same time. Fact is that main competition for Switch now are XB1/PS4.

I dont see Switch failing in any case, but I see Switch hardware revisions in any case (just handheld Switch, more powerful Switch, Switch VR/AR addon...).

Well said.

I'm very confused at why you're asking me to read specs I already knew when making the previous post and cry.

Yes those are the clock speeds which show that.

Switch Docked: 393GFlops (768mhz Clock)

Switch Undocked: 157GFlops (307.2mhz Clock) , 196GFlops (384mhz).

This doesn't change my post you quoted in the slightest as I already knew these figures. "Even with it getting more performance out of what it has 397GFlops is no where near 76% of 1312GFlops."

I think you're prehaps getting the clock speeds mixed up with GFlops, 768mhz is not 768GFlops.

No.... because the XBO GPU has more Shader Processors. GFlops takes Clock Speed and CU's into account.

Shader Processors * 2 * Clockspeed (1 = 1ghz) = GFlops

XBO has 768 shader processors and as you say a clock speed of 853mhz so.

XBO: 768 * 2 * 0.853 = 1310GFlops

Switch Docked: 256 * 2 * 0.768 = 393GFlops

Switch is NOT "more than 76%" XBO docked. PS4 has a GPU Clock of 800MHz so if we only look at it that way XBO is more powerful than the PS4 according to you.

I never said you had to do anything.

Uh... Clock Rate doesn't determine the absolute performance of hardware. Neither does Flops.

As for how flops are calculated it is determined as... Pixel Pipelines x Instructions per clock x clock rate.
Ergo... 256 pipelines x 2 instructions per clock x 384mhz core clock equates to 196 Gflop, 768Mhz equates to 393 Gflop.

But that ignores the Render-Output-Pipelines, Texture Mapping Units and other hardware that determines a chips capabilities as well.

As soon as we knew that the Switch was Tegra powered we knew it's performance was between a Wii U and Xbox One. That doesn't change regardless of it's clock speeds or flops.

To be fair, Maxwell does have a massive efficiency edge against Graphics Core Next Gen 1.0.
You can't really compare them with only a single numerical value that is only theoretical anyway.

Yes that's true, but my original comment was that even taking the greater efficiency into account it's not 76% the power of an XBO like Eagle was claiming.

Yes a fair cop. I'd forgotten just had bad the wii was. Still loved many of its games though. 12 gflops gpu vs around 250 gflops for ps3 or xbox 360 is over 20x difference. Even the original xbox was over 20 gflops. 

The Tegra X1 part is still a huge disappointment.