Fight the war equally, die and be conquered all equally.

Instead of Fight as lethally and precisely as possible, win and Live in peace equally.....?

Instead of Fight as lethally and precisely as possible, win and Live in peace equally.....?

Obviously never been to Russia.

I don't disagree with you, but if you have a woman that does exceed the average bloke in most areas, then she shouldn't be denied any role just because she is a Grill.

The "average bloke" has no place in the United States military combat units. Women should be open to apply to any position they are qualified for, but mixed gender combat units are imbalanced and an extremely unpopular idea among members of the military.

Anyone who makes the argument that because some women are stronger than men, they should be able to do everything a male soldier does. This is true for just about everything except for combat roles. Averages have no meaning whenever the cream are able to rise to the top.

The "average bloke" has no place in the United States military combat units. Women should be open to apply to any position they are qualified for, but mixed gender combat units are imbalanced and an extremely unpopular idea among members of the military.

Anyone who makes the argument that because some women are stronger than men, they should be able to do everything a male soldier does. This is true for just about everything except for combat roles. Averages have no meaning whenever the cream are able to rise to the top.

Gotta stop you right there. No, this is not true. You are only born with so many muscle fibers and man or woman this is a sliding scale, it is not set in stone and the vast majority of women have less muscle fibers at birth. Men are also capable of using muscle to a greater potential and have much greater abundance of the chemical make up that produce agressive heightened states of fight or flight. But even if there were exo skeletons and chemical and hormonal stim packs for everyone in the military woman still should not be in battle imo, they simply don't have the thousands of years of war and fighting in the blood as men do and by blood I mean in the way men have evolved chemically and mentally. Along with other issues like extremists targeting the woman in some sick way. A male POW is at worst getting tortured, a female POW is getting raped and tortured along with all that these cultures find acceptable. Should women who fight be steralized and trained on how to handle endless daily rapings from multiple men as a POW....I could go on for days, to the fact that a female POV would become a serious PR issue and put more soldiers at risk in the rescue attempts....on for days...

I would argue that averages should have no meaning when determining the qualifications of individuals either.  Thus, if there is a woman who can meet the same requirements as the men for a combat unit then I see no reason to deny that individual that role.  If the minimum necessary for that role means that only .1% of women qualify while 2-3% of men do I think that's fair, but it's when you deny any woman the chance to even try that I disagree with the system.