Torillian said:
I would argue that averages should have no meaning when determining the qualifications of individuals either. Thus, if there is a woman who can meet the same requirements as the men for a combat unit then I see no reason to deny that individual that role. If the minimum necessary for that role means that only .1% of women qualify while 2-3% of men do I think that's fair, but it's when you deny any woman the chance to even try that I disagree with the system. |
Of course, I'm not saying that deny anyone the chance, but using a sliding scale as suggested can only cause potential harm.