Well, honestly, it actually doesn't, because we can't see an alternate reality where Hillary won. Regardless of how good or bad Trump turns out to be, people will argue 'til they're blue in the face about how Hillary would've been better or worse. So... No, it doesn't actually remain to be seen. A choice was made, and we'll see the results of that choice. We will not see whether Hillary was the greater evil or not, though my personal conviction that she was is strong.

US healthcare sucks, but it's not simply paying a "little more" tax. Let's say you're a 25 year old, just out of college, and earning the median salary of $45,000 per year. The absolute cheapest plan on the ACA that you can pay for would cost $200.75 per month, or a little over $2,400 per year. That's with a $7,150 deductible as well. Factor taxes, housing, transporation, food, utilities, and other living expenses into that, and you have, according to Time Money, the average out of college student with around $675 ($8,100 per year) left to spend each month before healthcare. Now tack that $200.75 onto that, and you've instantly taken out nearly a third of your spending money that was left over (oh, and this doesn't even begin to consider paying back student loans, if you have any of those). Furthermore, this healthcare doesn't even particularly matter to you, except in the case of emergenies. You won't find many 25 year olds racking up $7,150+ of healthcare expenses in a single year.

To put it simply, this isn't a smart decision for the "young invincibiles" crowd that Democrats were banking on to make the ACA a success. And it's not simply people being selfish and refusing to pay a "little more" in taxes; it's nearly a third of their average disposable income leftover each month that may need to go towards a myriad of other things, such as a new car, or paying off student loans, or whatever. And for those who make less than the median $45,000 a year, good luck figuring out how to juggle all that. A significant number of students will simply take the penalty and pay $700 per year than take the $2400 a year hit for healthcare they will likely never benefit from. 

And that's largely what's happened. The ACA isn't struggling because there's a whole bunch of greedy rich people up there who refuse to shell out an additional $200 for healthcare; those people already have healthcare and are already paying into the system. The ACA is struggling because it banked on convincing a large group of relatively unwealthy low risk people to pay much more for healthcare than they already were, and that's just simply not going to happen when their finances are tight already.

All corporations would have to agree to pay higher salaries for their employees. Usually politicians don't get things done when corporations are against such things, or things move only very slowly forward. Stichwort: Schummelsoftware in Autos von deutschen Konzernen.

lol they had 6 years to come up with somethiing and never once shown anything concrete. Even now, they are talking repeal and delay. There is no replacement. All that was just more GOP grandstanding.

Yeah, I read about that. Repeal it but delay when the repeal takes place for another few years. That way they get to tell the voters that they've repealed it but coming up with a new plan is on the next administration. It's diabolically genius if you ask me.

Any links or stories top these plans? Not saying they don't exist, but many Republicans have said they need to come up with a plan before they repeal ObamaCare. Apparently only a few of them know about these 7 or 8 different plans.

This has always been the case.  I mean we decimated an entire race, killled an entire species of buffalo, and ...vietnam.

We are not smart.