By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Thanks for the responses! I have a better picture of what seems to be the issue.



Pocky Lover Boy! 

Around the Network
Jranation said:
Thanks for the responses! I have a better picture of what seems to be the issue.

Unfortunately, I don't think that any of us that responded to you were actually mods



tbone51 said:
vivster said:

That would mean we have to moderate Nintendo. Just calling something something doesn't make it a fact. A handheld gaming device has a pretty tight definition and Nintendo won't change that by calling an elephant a unicorn.

This why i hate when people say ssb isnt a fighter. Sakurai had to say it is a party brawler lol

Super Smash Bros is played at EVO.

 

Nuff said.



tbone51 said:
vivster said:

That would mean we have to moderate Nintendo. Just calling something something doesn't make it a fact. A handheld gaming device has a pretty tight definition and Nintendo won't change that by calling an elephant a unicorn.

This why i hate when people say ssb isnt a fighter. Sakurai had to say it is a party brawler lol

Where I live, that's a regionalism for an overly aggressive/rough guy in group sex scenario. I voted no. TBH, I'm not taking this issue too seriously. No offense to the efforts of the mod team, or those of us who find such activity harmful. Maybe it was the wrong choice. If it accrues to a certain point, sure, pull the trigger, and start the banning. I went, fairly quickly, from finding Pinkie_Pie mildly irritating, to mildly amusing. It's a relatively strict shtick with her, so it's something of an outlier example. I see most responses to her posts illicit similar reactions. At the very least, posts like these can serve to grease the wheels to some degree. Ignore. Maybe have some fun with them. There should be limits to any type of shit disturbing behavior, and as with everything else, it's case by case. In general, it doesn't bother me much.



- "If you have the heart of a true winner, you can always get more pissed off than some other asshole."

well seeing that mods cant recognise mainstream memes i doubt they can recognise and be objective













yes this is purely because i haven't had a refund yet



 "I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007

Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions

Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.

Around the Network

If we have evidence that VR causes temporary blindness, headaches (for the mods) and makes people act irrationally, is it not reasonable to reconsider the theory that VR causes brain damage?

While we're on the subject of undoing moderations, this comment (http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8707172) went completely unpunished while a near exact comment by me (http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3554735) resulted in a 5 day ban.



Nov 2016 - NES outsells PS1 (JP)

Don't Play Stationary 4 ever. Switch!

Pyro as Bill said:
If we have evidence that VR causes temporary blindness, headaches (for the mods) and makes people act irrationally, is it not reasonable to reconsider the theory that VR causes brain damage?

While we're on the subject of undoing moderations, this comment (http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8707172) went completely unpunished while a near exact comment by me (http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3554735) resulted in a 5 day ban.

Because you don't deserve the benefit of the doubt. Also I think you were banned previously for making a thread about VR "health issues".



Barkley said:
Pyro as Bill said:
If we have evidence that VR causes temporary blindness, headaches (for the mods) and makes people act irrationally, is it not reasonable to reconsider the theory that VR causes brain damage?

While we're on the subject of undoing moderations, this comment (http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8707172) went completely unpunished while a near exact comment by me (http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3554735) resulted in a 5 day ban.

Because you don't deserve the benefit of the doubt. Also I think you were banned previously for making a thread about VR "health issues".

Sony fans were trolling/spreading lies about the 3DS so I researched my own personal theory about VR which appears to have some merit. The other moderation is not related to VR.



Nov 2016 - NES outsells PS1 (JP)

Don't Play Stationary 4 ever. Switch!

Pyro as Bill said:
Barkley said:

Because you don't deserve the benefit of the doubt. Also I think you were banned previously for making a thread about VR "health issues".

Sony fans were trolling/spreading lies about the 3DS so I researched my own personal theory about VR which appears to have some merit. The other moderation is not related to VR.

The "you don't deserve the benefit of the doubt" was the response to the moderation that wasn't about VR.

Different users posts are treated differently, as they should be. Also 8 years is a long time, what is acceptable and not acceptable changes with time also. You shouldn't view yourself as being treated unjustly, rather the moderators have been FAR too lenient with you.



CGI-Quality said:
Pyro as Bill said:

Sony fans were trolling/spreading lies about the 3DS so I researched my own personal theory about VR which appears to have some merit. The other moderation is not related to VR.

Where?

Does 3d really hurt children's eyes?

Posts like this are a result of misinformation being spread by interested parties.



Nov 2016 - NES outsells PS1 (JP)

Don't Play Stationary 4 ever. Switch!