Mummelmann said:
Precisely; which shows that they have no faith in the physical market, which is, as mentioned, bad news for people who want proper quality video for their TV's they spent 3000 dollars on (I'm one of those). PS: with the PS2's staggered launch, fastest selling is debatable, the PS2 was only available in Japan and insignificant Asian markets for about 7-8 months. If you count from global availability, the PS2 will start pulling way ahead now. Besides; the Wii was the actual fastest selling console of all time, and it was of very little consequence in the long run. In an increasingly tech oriented market with consumers craving multi-purpose hardware, adding proper 4k playback wouldn't have hurt them either. Unless it was deemed a worthless effort, which is clearly is, so my point(s) still stands. |
I'm starting to lose faith in 4K blu-ray as well :( I have over 500 movies on blu-ray, was ready to make the switch 2 years ago, yet the more I hear about it, the less interested I get. 4K UHD discs upscaled from 2K masters, HDR effects added in post production, 4K projectors still way too expensive and not suitable to HDR, and I'll need a new hdmi 2.0 compatible amp.
I wanted to get The revenant on 4K, actual 4K master, yet it's still $35 ships in 1 to 2 months. I bought the blu-ray version for $15, arrived 2 days later. The Martian, currently $8 on blu-ray. 4K (upscaled from 2K) version $35!
Streaming 4K is not an option where I am, guess I'll stick to good old blu-ray for another year at least. It's a shame Sony seems to be leaving the physical disc market behind, no standalone player announced either.









