There are instances on Xbox One and PS4 where the same game runs at 720p on one and 1080p on the other, and the difference looks negligible to me.

I think it's possible Nvidia will change the 1:1 ratio of the TMU's and ROP's that's on the X1 for X2.

I cant believe people are compaireing the Tegra X2 to a Nvidia 830M....

1) The tegra X2 should be faster... pc to console, architecture differences ect.
2) Saying that the 830m can play games acceptably.. when those videos are 1280x720p and low-medium settings (and stutter).

Thats not really setting the bar very high.

As a Nintendo fan, if I get a NX Im not sure Id buy any 3rd party games on it, if they run 720p + medium settings on NX, but 1080p + High settings on PS4.

It's not pushing a dazzling array of effects.

The Art Style infact tends to hide allot of the technical inadequecies that the hardware has forced on it.

That tends to be my line of thinking.

Upscalers today are far far far better than what is inside the Wii and Wii U and will also enhance the image in various ways, don't assume that past hardware is some kind of representation of newer hardware.

For a tablet sized system, 830M visuals would be fine by me. Actually many of the games run at 1366x768, which is not a huge difference, but still technically more pixels to render. Since NX is likely only going to have a 6-7 inch display they could go even lower than that. 

But Nintendo could make some gorgeous games of their own on a chip like that and PS4 ports would be possible even on the go which would be fairly significant. 

There definitely would be some third party games I'd consider buying on the NX over the PS4 if they were in the same ball park ... EA's FIFA or NHL games for sure. Have wanted portable versions of the "real" FIFA and NHL games to play on the go for ages. Would be awesome to be able to play something like that on an 8 hour flight. Or Dragon Quest XI or Final Fantasy VII or Soul Calibur VI, I'd honestly have to think about it. 

For "home mode" they should sell a SCD dock with extra processing power that allows games to run in medium/medium high settings and 1080P when at home. If they did that I'd buy the NX version basically every time because why should I buy the PS4/XB1 versions that I can only play at home, when the NX version plays where ever I want and can then play at home with similar graphics on my TV. 

I think design wise that would be the best compromise. Too bad Nintendo is probably too dense to realize this though. 

Same, I can't really tell the difference between 1080 and 720 by sitting a few feet away from the TV. Also, i put gameplay and story over graphics. To this day i have more fun playing old gen games like final fantasy X than newer rpgs.

I bought COD MW/W@W/BO/MW3 on Wii, and those ran at 480p and settings lower than PC's lowest. XD

Honestly, I'm not expecting NX to get any substantial Western third party support. And frankly, that doesn't really bother me. What bothers me is whether it'll be another generation of droughts, delays, and unambitious software on Nintendo's end.

I'd prefer 4K resolution @ 12fps

To give the OP a frame of reference, here's what Wii U can do at 1080p/60fps:

And here's what it can do at 720p/60fps:

Note how the lower screen resolution allows the latter far more rendering budget for shaders and effects.

If the NX is powerful enough, we would be seeing fidelity that exceeds the bottom screen at 1080p