I would personally say OoT is a very strong 98.

What say we settle at 98.5? XD

A very strong 98 would be a 98.8-98.9, lol. 

I think this summarises everything quite perfectly.

I played it back when it first game out. Played the 3DS version last year. It has flaws. Love Zelda franchise. Love OoT but 99 is far to high for this game.

Uhm... Of course it's "merely" an opinion. Do you think what you're saying is a fact?

Honestly, not a very big fan of either game. OoT is my least favorite Zelda game (crazy huh?) but it would probably be my pick. Not really a fan of fighting games outside of SF2 Alpha and Smash, GTA lost me after the two first ones and Tony Hawk is what it is.

Around GTA4 and Halo whatever that time, it was clearly the time of being paid for reviews.

Maybe not "directly" but completely money bought. Go to a website like IGN back in the time those games where reviewed and their entire page was filled with said games advertisements. That is a complete conflict of interest. If said site gives it a bad review, you can bet they will see less ad revenue in future.

It's like the whole accountants and Enron back in the day. Auditors would not give companies bad reports, becuase if they did, the companie would just fire them and hire someone else. That would mean the accounting firm would lose out on a million dollar contract. YOu as an accountatn going to go back to your firm and tell them you lost a billion dollar company because you told them their books didn't match perfectly. They woudl be pissed. 

Same for reviewers. You don't think their editors were like "hey why don't you raise this score by 1 or 2. We are getting thousands of dollars from this company in ad revenue. You wanna keep your job."

Yeah, I don't think it even deserves 100.

You saying that Im wrong for the remark I made, because I critized about people who didnt like the game the same I did, but you go on(or before, since you made that post before me) to criticize people that the reasoning that you should rate the games based when they released is silly.If my critic is "sad", or wrong to make in other words, how come yours isnt?Thats what I meant by double standards.

I never said that scores shouldnt be criticized.Scores are given by persons and just as ourselves, they are bound to eventually make mistakes, or not make a quality or objective review.And review is an opinion anyways, so its really subjective at the first place.What i said is that reviewers scores in general should be respected.One thing that people(again, in general) is that, while reviews scores should not be used as a definitive metric of wether you will enjoy the game or not, the reviewers are professionals.They are persons that dedicate their lives to the videogame industry.While I do agree that individual scores should be held with a certain level of skeptimism, agregate scores such as metacritic, for all the flaws the system has, should have some level of respect.After all, its the job of the reviewers review games, and while there are clickbait reviews here and there, the serious ones far outweight them.

Plus I find your reasoning about "if a game ages poorly, it means it was overrated at the first place" completely wrong.First because anything ages, from music to games to movies to any kind of product.Everything gets outdated, because the newer products are build upon the older ones.We wouldnt have the level of tecnological fidelity today if someone didnt pioneer things in the first place.So of course the older models, or older games will be outdated as the years passes.Thats why its silly to judge something by today standards.Secondly is that any game will be worse 10, 20 years after its release.Its obvious, since the modern games will take the best parts of the games that came before and build upon it and make it better.Any game ages, including even your favorite games.A game that was 90 in the past, may be 80 by nowadays metrics.So its not only unfair to make such assumptions, but also completely wrong.One thing that would be a good metric however, is how well the game has aged.Now that has merit.And OOT for me has aged really well.

Now to your last point, I agree with you.Criticizing someone because they think you didnt play the game the right way is stupid.I mean, the experiencing to playing the game when it launches and playing the same game 10 years later will of course be different, but if you keep thinking thats the reason someone didnt like the game, when the game was not their cup of tee at the first place is wrong.