Animations > everything else.

It's why Syphon Filter and Spyro were amazing on PS1, and it's why Uncharted 4 is in a league of its own. Too bad the game is boring, annoying and unplayable to me.

Zero, you must be in denial; this is clearly the best looking game ever. Weep from behind your puny PC, for Console Gamers have become gods.

well i never was interested into digital games in the first place even when i was a PC gamer. But i do think they they modify the original game or something, or are setting the options in the correct settings in order for you to run these games.

And they are plenty of examples of older PC game who had a Disc version in the past but were rereleased on Steam, like Grandia 2. Why was it necessary  to release Grandia 2 when it allready exist as a PC DVD release? And there are countless of examples where PC games are silently rerealesed digitally: Resident Evil 5 Gold edition, Dark Souls 2 Sholar of the first Sin and so on. And people are happy of these rereleases on steam like they never existed before on PC. 

I never could figure out Dosbox properly on each game, sometimes it worked sometimes it didnt. Same with virtual OSs. Maybe you can run every PC game with these tools on a new OS but do you know what? is it worth it? To spend so much time, trial and error in order just to run a game instead actually gaming? Not for me anymore

yeah sure 

"It would look better on PC" is not an argument, because it would also look better on a even stronger PC than you are using for your argument, so your PC is disappointing and weak and therefore shouldnt even be brought up in conversation.

Seriously though. Is there another game right now that does everything UC4 does? I highly doubt it.

I am quite shocked to read the respons from the fellow Master-race... Quite repulsive to read...


Uncharted don't have high enough settings, basically it...... If settings is graphics, you lost focus on it's entiety, Games are more then just settings.. As a pc gamer, i am ashamed to read the bollocks.. I kinda hoped these guys bought pc because it offered them a libary but no, Higher settings... If you can't have over 1080p and 60fps, the game is ugly.. Phonies

Exactly my point. That's why in my previous post i mentioned the original 399 price point. But i think ppl misunderstood the point of this thread. Yeah a 5000 euro PC will run a game at 8k 300fps. BUT, what makes good graphics goes beyond that.

Example: Witcher1 and witcher3 both running at 4k/60fps. Are they on the same graphic league?

Hey, I'm somewhat offended lol :P (not really). Anyway, I thought what I had to say as a primarily PC gamer was fair :

"

As a primarily PC gamer, I didn't see an option in the poll for what I feel, so I'll briefly summarize here :

The attention to overall detail, and production quality are absolutely outstanding. From sound to voice acting to motion capture to the level design is beyond stellar.

In pure graphical detail/performance, I'd have to say it's a little bit of a mixed bag. Obviously with a performance ceiling in place, even with the extreme wizardry of Naughty Dog on tap, you're going to see areas where PC games can/do look better in specific areas. Framerate is a big one, and you could go through the game and find spots here and there where they couldn't have extremely high detail textures in order to keep performance working smoothly. There are more than a few assets that look pretty average. But that shouldn't take away from the achievement whatsoever. It's a showcase game, and in totality has got to be considered with the best of the best in terms of a total experience. In my mind, the closest analog we can play on PC is TR 2015, and even running that in 4K at a better framerate it's still a 'lesser' game to me. The motion cap and world design of UC4 is just better.

I feel like I haven't answered that well enough, but there you have it. I couldn't possibly have more respect for ND as a dev. I could only imagine how good a proper PC port would look, but obviously that's impossible, so we can only marvel at what they were able to accomplish on such meager specs."

I didn't vote obviously due to the lack of option but if there was an entry for me it would be :

"Awesome achievement. Best in the industry in some respects, though you can still tell that ND was straining against the limits of the hardware"

With PC, you can take a mediocre game, set it to 4K, run it at 120FPS, run max details, god rays, yadda/etc, but if the content and art are just mediocre, it will just be a sharper/clearer/smoother mediocre experience. On the flip side, if you take a pretty awesome game (IMHO stuff like BF4, FC4, Skyrim, Witcher series, etc) and run it at 1440P or 4K with much improved smoothness and details, then it helps.

But in the end, it's all about fun right? Hell I have played on computers and consoles for the better part of my 39 years on this planet. I'm sure as hell not going to argue with anyone about what they think is fun or looks great or whatever. It's in the eye of the beholder, and regardless of what I think, I'm happy for anyone that's having fun or is a fan of something. And UC4 to me is REALLY impressive in so many ways.

The bar has been set by the other party, there is no way anything like Star Citizen let alone any game on PC will ever top UC4, that's just how it;s going to roll according to some people.

Also the poll results are open ended which means anyone who doesn't game or even like PC gaming can cast their vote in which renders the poll pointless. 

I'd love to make a thread for Star Citizen when it releases and ask the same question, but I know it would get a resounding "meh".

Lol, so much BS in this thread. I play most of my games at 2k60 and yet have no issues with U4s 1080p30. Its a damn console game, what do you expect. Its simply phenomenal for the hardware its running on. Good lord some people can be so petty. Best graphics ever, no. Very impressive, absolutely.